VOICE OF THE DIABETIC
The Diabetes Action Network of the
National Federation of the Blind
A Support and Information Network
Volume 15, Number 2, Spring Edition 2000
VOICE OF THE DIABETIC, published quarterly, is
the
national magazine of the Diabetes Action Network
of the
National Federation of the Blind. It is read by those
interested in all aspects of blindness and
diabetes. We
show diabetics that they have options regardless
of the
ramifications they may have had. We have a positive
philosophy and know that positive attitudes are
contagious.
News items, change of address notices, and other
magazine correspondence should be sent to: Ed Bryant,
Editor, Voice of the Diabetic, 1412 I-70 Drive SW, Suite C,
Columbia, Missouri 65203; Phone: (573) 875-8911; Fax:
(573) 875-8902.
Find us on the World Wide Web at: http://www.nfb.org
and follow the links for "diabetes."
Copyright 2000 Diabetes Action Network, National
Federation of the Blind. ISSN 1041-8490
Note:
The information and advice contained in VOICE OF
THE DIABETIC are for educational purposes, and
are not
intended to take the place of personal
instruction provided
by your physician, or by your health care
team. Discuss any
changes in your treatment with the appropriate
health
professionals.
ADVERTISERS
Effective advertising doesn't scream at its
audience.
It persuades.
It sells. The key to
cost-effective
advertising is making your voice heard where an
audience is
already listening. VOICE OF THE DIABETIC, circulation
280,382+, offers such an outlet. Make your voice heard.
For VOICE OF THE DIABETIC advertising
information contact:
Eileen Rivera Ley
National Advertising Sales Manager
804 Hatherleigh Road
Baltimore, MD, 21212
Phone:
(410) 296-7760
Fax:
(410) 296-7645
or find us on the Web at:
http://www.nfb.org/voice.htm
For SUBSCRIPTION information, see the end of
this document.
FREE!
FREE!
VOICE OF THE DIABETIC is offered absolutely free
to any
interested person upon request. Readers may receive the
publication in standard print, on audio cassette
for the
blind, or in both formats. To begin receiving the VOICE,
please complete the subscription form (or a
facsimile),
found at the end, and mail it to the editorial
office.
Please Note:
We have a special bulk-mailing permit
that we use to ship the VOICE to you at low
cost--it does
not allow for free re-mailing. The Post Office requires you
place first class postage on any VOICE you mail
to others.
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
69 YEARS WITH DIABETES: HAROLD FELENDER
MANY BLIND DIABETICS SUCCESSFULLY USE INSULIN
PUMPS
by Ed Bryant
TEN YEARS WITH MY INSULIN PUMP
by Joanna Stottler
AN OPEN LETTER TO READERS
by Marc Maurer
DIABETES:
WHERE WE ARE TODAY, WHERE WE'LL BE TOMORROW
by Frank Vinicor, MD, MPH
BENEFITS OF THE INSULIN PUMP
TYPE 1 DIABETES PREVENTION TRIAL NEEDS
VOLUNTEERS
TYPE 2 AND HEALTHY LIFESTYLE
by Peter J. Nebergall, PhD
TAKE TIME TO SMELL THE ROSES: MARIA JOHNSON
TYPE 1 VACCINE?
BOOK REVIEWS
by Marilyn Helton
RECIPE CORNER
ASK THE DOCTOR
by Wesley W. Wilson, MD
DIALYSIS AT NATIONAL CONVENTION
by Ed Bryant
2000 NATIONAL CONVENTION
COOKING WITH SUZI
by Suzi Castle
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
WHAT YOU ALWAYS WANTED TO KNOW BUT DIDN'T KNOW
WHERE TO ASK
(Resource Column)
69 YEARS WITH DIABETES: HAROLD FELENDER
Photo:
portrait. Caption: Harold Felender
"I was born October 19, 1918.
I can't remember
exactly when I was diagnosed with diabetes--I
believe I was
12 or 13 years old. I was very young, and I'm 81 now. I
went into the hospital at Christmastime, but I
don't
remember which year. I've had diabetes at least 69 years...
It could be even more.
A little incident in that hospital sounds funny
now.
First I went to the clinic, and from there they
sent me to
the hospital.
It was Christmastime, then. My
diet was so
restricted...
They served me a tray with a little ornament-
-a gumdrop and one of those candy bubble
ornaments. I ate
the whole thing! I was so hungry I ate anything that was
around.
It was kind of cute. You weren't
supposed to eat
that kind of thing--I found that out later.
I wasn't in a coma, yet. I urinated a lot, all the
normal symptoms of new diabetes. Fortunately, they got me
OK before I passed out or anything.
I was taught, there in the hospital, how to give
myself
shots.
My mother had tuberculosis, so she was not at home,
and my grandmother was there but she didn't know
too much
about those things, so I had to do everything
myself. The
hospital staff taught me... I think they used an orange or
a grapefruit for me to put the needle into, just
to get the
feel of it.
I ate a lot of oranges in the evenings, back
when I was
young.
That was my bad time--lots of hypos--and we would
buy dozens of oranges and I would eat them quite
a bit.
Oranges used to be a pretty standard thing to
get you back
up. I
couldn't use any sugar back then. But I
used to slip
a bit into my coffee to give it a little flavor,
you know.
I started out with three shots a day (there was
only
Regular insulin, those days). I was going to school, so
they took that into consideration, and shifted
me to two
shots, morning and night. Now I'm on a sliding scale
besides two shots a day. Now I use the Ultralente for
morning and night and in between, on a sliding
scale, I use
Humalog.
You know, I was a Boy Scout. I made Senior Patrol
Leader, and even went on an overnight, sleeping
in a pup
tent, with my insulin.
My sugars fluctuate too much, now. They call it
"brittle diabetes." My numbers can go from 350 down to 80
or 70, and I won't feel any different. I don't really know
why all this happens. Sometimes, you do a lot of exercise
or something and you know that will help bring
it down. But
I found out later that when the sugar was high
to start
with, exercising could make it even higher. (Editor's Note:
Doctors advise caution starting physical
exercise with a
blood sugar reading of 250mg/dL or higher. Diabetics should
consult with their health care team before
beginning an
exercise program.)
I was strict on my diet. I didn't eat sugar. That was
the main thing.
As far as everything else, I would eat most
any food that didn't have added sugar. I ate within reason,
I didn't measure anything. The hospital put me on an 1800-
calorie diet and that seemed to be plenty for
me. They
increased it to 2000, I think, when I got married.
Of course when they released saccharin for
diabetics
that was really great. I've used that for over 30 years. I
still use it as a sweetener.
My wife, Beatrice, and I had three
children. Those
were the days when they thought it wasn't too
wise for a
diabetic to have children. But we went ahead and we have
three lovely children. My wife passed away two years ago.
She had cancer.
My oldest is Donna. My son, Duane, was next.
And the
baby is Elizabeth. They are all married and have their own
children.
The first was born in '41. One
about four years
later and the last one was four or five years
after that.
My oldest, Donna, is the one who takes care of
me all the
time.
The youngest daughter is in South Carolina so she's
out of the picture. My son is in Simi Valley, California,
but he has to work all the time, so he comes in
the evenings
and during the weekend sometimes, and we go to
dinner. But
my daughter is here every week and calls me
every day.
From the Editor: Daughter Donna describes her father
as "amazing... strong in mind and body,
someone who figures
things out.
Diabetes never seemed to interfere with any
part of his life," she says. "I have diabetes as well, and
he has been a role model--I look at him, and
know I'll be
all right."
To keep track of my diabetes, in those early
days
(Harold continues), I regularly tested my
urine. I didn't
have to use the test you boiled over a Bunsen
burner. I had
strips you dip into the urine, then look at the
color.
That's what I used for a long time.
When I was young, my diabetes seemed to be under
control.
Once we first got married, my wife, Beatrice, took
over my diabetes management. She was really excellent. She
watched everything. I didn't have to do a thing.
I
depended on her, and that's what made it so
difficult when
she passed away. I didn't know anything. I
had to learn
everything again.
I started out as a sheet-metal worker, making
aircraft.
That was another thing. Jobs were scarce at the time and
just before I got married I went to North
American Aviation
two times.
And they didn't hire me. But
then I went to an
air conditioning school, that agreed to find me
a job. When
I finished the school, they sent me back to
North American,
and I got the job. I had diabetes, but in those days you
didn't advertise it too much. So that's one reason I guess,
they did take me on.
In 1970, when only our youngest daughter,
Elizabeth,
was still living at home, she decided she wanted
to attend
college in Israel. Not taking it seriously, I told her we
could not afford to send her, but that if she
could find me
a job there, we would all move to Israel, so she
could
attend the college. I thought that a fair offer, as I was
working for Rockwell Rocketdyne, and had 33
years of
seniority at the time.
A few months later, I received a formal
questionnaire
from Israel.
I completed and returned it, and shortly
received a 3-year contract from Israel Aircraft
Industries,
which would also pay our moving and
transportation both
there and back to the U.S.A. This would be a great
adventure.
Once we arrived in Israel, our first emergency
was
finding out that the only insulin Israel
produced was U-40,
far less concentrated than my U-100. Plus, the insulin
types I was using were unavailable. We immediately had my
company wire New York, and had some insulin
flown in. This
was expensive.
The next thing we found was that their syringes
had a
needle about 1/16 inch diameter--big! The people using them
had a scab each time, but didn't know any
different. We had
my daughter Donna, in the U.S.A., send us the
needles I
needed, and later we found drugstores that
imported the
insulin I needed. All this went on while I was working with
the Westwind business jet.
As I was working all day, my wife Beatrice had
to do
all the running around, on the bus (we didn't
get a car
until later).
Finding different drugstores, in a strange
town and different language, she earned more
than her pay
then.
I joined Lodge #51 of the Free and Accepted
Masons,
there in Israel, and stayed involved with
them. When we
returned to the U.S.A. in 1980, we transferred
to a Masonic
Lodge near where we lived, in Canoga Park,
California. When
I moved to Coldwater North Co-Op, North
Hollywood, I
transferred to Beverly Hills Lodge #528, and went
through
the stations, becoming Master of the Lodge in
1991.
Now, it's much easier for a diabetic to get
jobs. Some
companies are still restrictive, but
generally it's easier
all around.
Of course, I'm Jewish, and I had more trouble
getting a job being Jewish when I first started
than having
the diabetes!
But, that's another story. I
ended up
professionally as a quality assurance
engineer. I was a job
shopper the last five years I worked. It's higher than an
inspector.
It was for metal work, but I worked in
electronics, too. Some people say I had too much experience
for the years that I worked.
I have a lot of friends and family, not close,
but
distant, who have diabetes, and who thought it
was a joke.
They would take some beer sometime or would eat
chocolate
bars sometime, and they paid the price--the side
effects of
diabetes.
In the end, it killed some of them--the side
effects.
I would say definitely to watch the diet. That's
the important thing. The exercise? I never
believed in
tying myself down to a routine of exercise which
I knew
every day I wouldn't be doing. But some exercise is
definitely good. And they say walking is the easiest thing,
which I used to do. I used to walk three miles in about 45
minutes which is about three miles an hour, not
fast.
I am having some problems now. I haven't had any
amputations or anything like that. I'm passing out from the
low blood sugar reactions. I don't have any warning, I
don't feel anything's coming, but out I go. Like Saturday
night here.
We went out for lunch and finished about 3:00.
And about 7:00, I came in to take a test at home
and my
meter said "error." So I tried it again and it said
"error"
again.
The third time I really watched everything I was
doing to be sure I wasn't doing anything wrong
and it said
"error" for the third time. I went to get my manual, and I
passed out.
I test six to eight times a day. I have to now. It
fluctuates so much and I pass out so easy that I
have to be
more careful.
(Editor's Note: The
"hypoglycemia
unawareness" Mr. Felender describes is not
uncommon, and the
actions he takes in response, to test more often
and be more
careful, are the correct ones.)
The people who have diabetes, they don't have to
worry
about being so exact and everything, you
know. It isn't
torture to have it. It's just if they stay away from foods
with sugars.
Now that everything is marked, it's much
easier.
If something has more than 2 grams of sugar, I
don't use it except for special purposes. I control it that
way. I
try to use zero sugars in all the foods I eat.
From the Editor: Although the concept of "diabetic
diet" has moved on from "no
sugar" to meal planning that
controls the entire food intake, allowing sugar
in
moderation while limiting fat intake, Mr.
Felender is right,
it is important to stick to your diet, and to
test blood
glucose regularly. He is to be congratulated for his
diligence, and for doing so well.
MANY BLIND DIABETICS SUCCESSFULLY USE INSULIN
PUMPS
by Ed Bryant
Photos (5 total, in order): portraits.
Captions (in
order):
Tom Ley, Donna Blake, Sally York, Anne Whittington,
Veronica Elsea.
Insulin pumps, which deliver a continuous dose
of
insulin, are being used by more and more
diabetics, blind
and sighted, to achieve better diabetes control.
Unfortunately, there are health professionals
who assume it
isn't possible for a blind patient, or one with
severe
vision loss, to operate an insulin pump. Too many health
professionals, and some blind people, have the
misconception
that blindness is synonymous with inability.
This article is intended to educate both the
health
care community and blind diabetics, to show them
that most
people with type 1 diabetes can successfully use
an insulin
pump if they desire.
Today's pump is about the size of a deck of
cards, and
is computerized. Insulin runs from the pump, through a tube
(catheter or cannula) which is usually attached
to the
abdomen or thigh. Insulin is delivered under the skin,
through the tiny, flexible tube. The user programs the pump
for basal (continuous) delivery, small amounts
of short-
acting insulin 24 hours a day. He/she also programs the
insulin pump for bolus insulin delivery, to
receive extra
insulin just before eating. Insulin pumps have several
different controls and alarms, and your doctor
may want you
to spend a few days in the hospital for
training.
Insulin pump users need to check their blood
glucose at
least four times a day. Since only short-acting insulin is
used, it is important the user check blood
sugars regularly
to avoid really high or low blood glucose. Warning:
If the
needle, or catheter, comes out from under the
skin, there is
no warning alarm to alert the user; and ketone
can start
building up in about one hour. With little or no insulin in
the body, ketoacidosis can develop in just a few
hours.
Note:
Pump users say the needle or cannula rarely, if ever,
comes out; and if it does, they can feel what
happened.
Additionally, if the needle has detached from
the skin, then
insulin will flow onto the clothing which will
after a while
become wet.
Most users should also be cognizant of leaking
insulin, as it smells very bad. To reiterate, it is
important that you closely monitor your blood
sugars.
An insulin pump might be what you need if you
are
having major problems controlling your blood
glucose with
insulin shots.
You might consider a pump if insulin
injections do not keep your blood glucose near a
normal
level, or if you have big glucose swings. Nighttime can be
difficult for some, because they have episodes
of
hypoglycemia, or get up in the morning with high
blood
sugars before breakfast. The pump can be programmed, so it
can deliver less insulin at night and more
insulin before
dawn, minimizing nighttime lows and before
breakfast glucose
highs.
We should all be monitoring our blood glucose,
working toward tight control. We should all be working with
our health care team to reach euglycemia, normal
blood
glucose.
You may be able to wear your insulin pump while
bathing
or swimming.
Some pumps are waterproof and some come with a
water protective case.
Insurance
Some insurance companies will help with the cost
of
pumps and supplies. They realize better diabetes control
means less diabetes complications, less time in
the
hospital, and a bottom line of less expense for
the
insurance provider. Your doctor should be able to help show
insurance companies the value of covering the
cost of pumps
and supplies.
As of April 1, 2000, Medicare began helping type
1
diabetics with the cost of pumps and related
supplies. For
information, telephone: 1-800-633-4227, and ask for
"Durable Medical Equipment."
Pump Manufacturers and Costs
Disetronic Medical Systems, Inc.
5151 Program Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55112
telephone:
1-800-280-7801
website:
http://www.disetronic-usa.com
They offer the H-tron Plus which costs $4,995,
and
comes with a second, backup pump (after 30
months, you send
the first pump back for servicing, and use the
backup).
Their much smaller pump, the Dahedi, about 2/3
the size and
weight, should cost about $5,000, and has
simple, two-button
programming (but no backup pump). Disetronic says this pump
will be available in May. Their newest insulin pump, the D-
Tron, scheduled for later this year, will offer
computer
interfacing, increased programmability,
vibration and audio
alarms, plus compatibility with insulin pen
cartridges (no
price data yet). Supplies for any current pump, including
test strips, cost about $300 per month. Disetronic does not
currently provide adaptive instructions on
audiocassette--
and when I asked them, they said they were
afraid of
"litigation."
MiniMed Technologies
12744 San Fernando Road
Sylmar, CA 91342
telephone:
1-800-933-3322
website:
http://www.minimed.com
They offer the MiniMed 508. It costs $5,495. Again,
supplies, including test strips, should cost
about $300 per
month.
This pump allows remote control setting with a key-
ring sized "control unit," and a "vibrating"
mode can be
chosen, instead of the beep, for both settings
and alarms.
Minimed is currently working with our Diabetes
Action
Network to produce an audiocassette of
instructions for
blind pumpers.
The insulin pump is an amazing device. If you have
type 1 diabetes, and need to use insulin, the
pump best
approximates the function of a healthy,
non-diabetic
pancreas.
Can a blind diabetic use it, fill it, program it,
attach it, independently, without sighted
aid? Absolutely.
As I said, there are still people who believe
otherwise, and some who just don't know. Who are the
"experts" in this case? The blind pumpers who are doing it
for themselves.
Here's what they had to say about their
pumps:
Why should a blind diabetic consider the insulin
pump?
Susan Stewart, a blind pump user from Medina,
Ohio,
says:
"I've always wanted to be on the pump; it was a
convenience thing. The pump gives me more flexibility. If
you're considering an insulin pump, definitely
really look
into it, because it has given me independence
and
freedom..."
Tammy Rupp, a blind pumper from Carrolton,
Georgia,
says:
"The good thing about the pump is that you can be
real flexible.
You don't have to be on a schedule.
You can
be, but you don't have to be."
Sally York, a blind pumper from Castro Valley,
California, and Board Member of our National
Federation of
the Blind Diabetes Action Network, says: "My MiniMed
insulin pump has given me back my
independence. I can't
imagine going back to life on multiple
injections. I can
honestly declare my pump has given my life a
positive
boost."
What specialized techniques do you use to
manipulate
the pump without sight?
"With respect to filling the syringe,"
says Tom Tobin,
a blind pumper from Cleveland, Ohio, "I
have developed a
system that works well without any sighted
assistance.
First, when filling the syringe, I pull down on
the plunger
until the bottom of the syringe barrel and the
plunger are
about the distance from the tip of my index
finger to my
first knuckle; so as a measuring device, you
always have
your knuckle.
"Then, as with a regular syringe, I tap the
sides of
the syringe barrel and then push the insulin
back into the
vial. I
repeat this step until I cannot hear any "bubbles"
escaping when pushing the insulin back into the
vial; there
should be a "smooth" sound.
"Next, since air may trap at the top of the
syringe
itself, I pull a little air into the syringe and
push up on
the plunger ever so slightly until insulin comes
out the tip
of the needle; just a little push. That completes filling
the syringe.
"Next, while holding the syringe in my left
hand, I
take the infusion tubing and remove the cover at
the end of
the tubing that goes over the neck of the
syringe, where the
needle once was. Make sure that there is a snug fit as you
tighten down the collar of the infusion set over
the neck of
the syringe.
(I sometimes use my teeth to make sure it is
really tight.)
Then I put the plunger of the syringe on a
flat surface, usually a table top, and begin
pushing down on
the barrel of the syringe, thus filling the
infusion set. I
want to stress, that this should be done very,
very slowly
to avoid any pocketing of air in the
tubing. If it is done
right, there should be no air bubbles at all in the
tubing.
Letting a drop fall on the back of your hand is
fine,
although I put the needle guard at the other end
of the
infusion set between my teeth, and use my tongue
to feel
when the drop falls. Whatever works for you."
Tom Ley, from Baltimore, Maryland, a blind
pumper and
former president of our NFB Diabetes Action
Network, says:
"The process of filling the Mini Med 507 C
pump with a fresh
supply of insulin can be performed successfully
by a person
using non-visual techniques. I will cover the subject of
inserting the cannula into the skin and securing
the cannula
with tape.
Let me say, at the beginning, that not once in
my two years of experience has the cannula ever
crimped or
otherwise unsuccessfully seated itself under the
skin when
being implanted. I also find this aspect of the process
very easy non-visually.
"It is much like giving a shot in many
ways. Once the
needle is inserted into the skin, a piece of
special tape is
used to hold the cannula in place. The tape is designed in
such a way that is extremely easy to position
correctly
without yet exposing the sticky side of the
tape. Once the
tape is in place, three pieces of paper that
cover the
sticky part of the tape must be removed. The pieces of
paper are pre- folded and shaped by the factory
to make
locating and removing extremely easy.
"Then, the final step is to remove the
needle from the
Teflon cannula.
One simply must locate the large plastic
end of the needle protruding from the skin
through a hole in
the tape, twist it a quarter of a turn, and pull
out to
remove.
It is possible that the cannula might crimp as it
is being inserted. However, it is standard operating
procedure to check your blood sugar an hour
after changing
the pump set.
If the sugar is abnormally high, then a set
of procedures should be followed to remedy the
situation.
This is no different than what a pump user does
any time
blood sugars seem unusually high. As said earlier, in two
years, I have not yet experienced any problems
of this
nature when changing my pump set."
"One of the first things I learned was to
line up my
insulin bottle with the needle and syringe that
holds the
insulin in the pump," says blind pumper
Donna Blake, from
Waterbury, Connecticut. "This may have not seemed like much
but at that time, I had never seen a
Count-A-Dose (tactile
insulin measuring device that enables blind
people to
accurately measure insulin without sight), nor
had I heard
about any alternative techniques for taking care
of insulin
and blood sugar needs.
"After I got the syringe filled, I devised
a simple way
to connect the syringe to the tubing aseptically
(in a
sterile manner). I placed my thumbs together guiding the
hub of the syringe into the Leur lock of the
tubing. I drew
the syringe back two fingers' width and this
gave me the
correct amount of insulin for three days. Next, I realized
that I had bubbles that I did not know about, so
back I went
to step one.
I found by pushing the insulin in and out of
the bottle several times (gently), I could
eliminate almost
all of the bubbles--most of the time, all of the
tiny
bubbles.
"In order to ensure that all of the air was
out of the
syringe, I would lightly tap the syringe on the
side of a
table to bring the bubbles to the top. Then I took the
syringe, pulled a bit of air into it, reinserted
the needle
into the bottle of insulin and shot out the
air. I then
tapped the needle on the side of the table and
pushed the
plunger until a few drops of insulin came out
(you can
really smell the insulin). I connected the tubing and the
syringe.
I held the syringe and the first few inches of
tubing upright and slowly depressed the plunger
so the
insulin filled the initial portion of the tubing
without
bubbles.
I continued pushing insulin through the tubing
until I felt a drop fall out and hit the back of
my hand.
"I was almost ready to insert the
needle/catheter. I
began this stage of the procedure after a shower
where I
scrubbed the site, where the catheter was placed,
thoroughly
with soap.
I dried this area off with a clean towel,
separate from my other towels. Next I prepared the site
with a liquid spray called "Sween
Prep," a protective skin
coating that keeps me from having an allergic
reaction to
the adhesive placed over the catheter site. While this
stuff dried, I placed the syringe in the pump
and primed two
units of insulin through. This step ensured that the
syringe inserted snugly within the pump and I
did not miss
any dose of insulin.
"When my site was ready to receive the
catheter, I
inserted the needle just like anyone else with
diabetes does
giving an injection. After I inserted the catheter, I
pulled out the small (25-gauge) needle and
placed a
protective tape over the catheter and now I
could go for
about three to four days."
What adaptive features are there to help you?
"It has a tone-activate button," says
Tammy Rupp. "You
press it, and it has a tone, and you count the
tones for
each unit you need, to get your insulin
bolus. Mine goes in
whole units; it can go in half-units, too. And it will
automatically count it back to you so you can
check it.
"There's also a select button that you use
with the
activate button, to clear the pump's alarm, if
it goes off.
There's an alarm for "low battery,"
for if something's wrong
with the infusion set, or if the pump is out of
insulin. It
beeps six times when you're out of insulin.
Visually-impaired pumper Anne Whittington, MBA,
MSN,
RN, CDE, from Augusta, Georgia, says: "Initially I was on
the MiniMed 504. I found the buttons cumbersome (with my
rheumatoid arthritis) and the contrast poor on
the screen.
In 1993, I switched to the Disetronic pump. The audible
alarms and crisp contrast met my needs
well."
Susan Stewart says: "My insulin pump has a screen,
which I cannot read, that shows date and time,
and when the
alarm goes off, it tells what the alarm is
for. It has four
buttons, and one of them is the
"select" button, with which
you select whatever screen you want. I use it by counting.
Once I hit the activate button, it beeps. And it has the up
and down arrows. When I do a bolus before I eat, I push the
button.
Say I want ten units; I'll push the button up;
it'll be 20 beeps. Then I push the activate button again,
and it will replay the number of beeps, each 1/2
unit of
insulin, that I selected. Another push on the activate
button, and it will start giving me the
insulin."
What about the cannula? Does it bother you? Is it safe?
Veronica Elsea, a blind pumper from Sylmar,
California,
says:
"The insulin is delivered through a needle or
cannula, which is placed anywhere you'd give an
injection
with a syringe.
I only use my abdomen; I find it easier and
more reliable.
I use a Teflon cannula called "Tenders,"
made by Disetronic. I find them easy to insert and very
forgiving.
In fact, if you have any neuropathy in your
hands, you may actually find these cannulas and
cartridges
quite a blessing, as they're fatter and larger
than regular
syringes.
The "Tenders" are inserted at an angle, anything
up to 45 degrees or so. I just hold it at a slant, push it
in and don't worry about it! As you might expect, once you
insert the cannula and remove its insertion
needle, it is
held in place with tape. With the new "Tenders," the tape
is part of the cannula, so I no longer find
myself holding
something in place while searching for a piece
of tape
somewhere on a table! It's designed for one-handed
operation by a sighted person, which means we
can do it
easily and comfortably with two.
"Only once, during an exuberant "good
morning," did my
guide dog reach up and catch her paw in the
tubing. It's a
weird feeling when you catch the tubing on
something, but it
takes real effort to knock out the
cannula."
"I'm not afraid that the catheter would
fall out," says
Susan Stewart.
"I use three pieces of medical tape holding
it in, and never in the months I've been using
it has it
come out, unless I mean to, when I'm taking it
off. You
have to really tug on it sometimes to get it
off--the tape
is very sticky.
Although there's no alarm that would sound
if it fell out, you would definitely know--you
would notice.
For one, my shirt would be soaked with the
insulin!
"Once you get used to wearing the cannula,
and to the
need to rotate it, you can tell if something's
wrong. I can
tell if the tape's loose. Usually on the third day, the
tape gets a little looser than the first or
second days,
since you've taken three showers since you
attached it.
"I can honestly say I feel practically no discomfort
at
all from the cannula that delivers my
insulin," says Tom
Ley.
"I find its presence far more comfortable than taking
four insulin injections per day."
Do you have any advice for blind diabetics who
are
considering
the insulin pump?
"A lot of people say to me, 'Oh, I want the
pump and I
don't want to get injections anymore," says
blind pumper
Tricia Kline, from Doylestown, Ohio. They think the pump is
the easy way out. And I would say, unless you have the
commitment to continue, if you think all you
have to do is
get a pump and you can eat anything you want to,
that you
don't have to do this and that, and you don't
have to do
blood sugar testing, unless you are committed to
do that and
really work at it, you won't succeed with the
pump. It's
not less work.
Sure, some people think you throw out your
injecting needles and that, but it's still a big
commitment.
And unless you're willing to do that, and
willing to, and
have the confidence to do, your own adjustments,
you won't
succeed with the pump. You have to develop, with your
doctor, a sliding scale; like if my blood sugar
is this
much, then I take this much insulin, or if it's
low I take
this much less.
You get to know your body. But
unless
you're willing to gain this much confidence in
yourself to
be able to make these changes on your own, you
will drive
your doctor crazy."
Anne Whittington says: "Before selecting the company
with the best pump for you, consult your
diabetes management
team members.
These team members go beyond your doctor, and
include your nurse dietitian, blind
rehabilitation
specialist, and whoever else may be assisting
you in
learning about the pump and its day-to-day
operation. Also,
please speak with customer service representatives
from the
major companies before you select a pump. Explain to them
your needs as a blind person. Both Disetronic and MiniMed
have very helpful service personnel."
"With the MiniMed 507 pump at my
side," says Tom Ley,
"I'm eagerly beginning a new phase of my
life with diabetes.
After 25 years, I welcome days free from insulin
injections.
I'm excited about the prospect of fewer high and
low blood
sugar incidents, and I will enjoy my new
mealtime
flexibility immensely. I'm comfortable, confident, and
content."
TEN YEARS WITH MY INSULIN PUMP
by Joanna Stottler
Photo:
portrait showing pump.
Caption: Joanna Stottler
Retired nurse Joanna Stottler has had type 1,
insulin
dependent diabetes for 52 years. A veteran of both sides of
diabetes care, she has also, for the last 10
years, been
using an insulin pump, instead of a syringe, to
supply the
insulin she must have. Here she shares with us some
observations on the insulin pump.
"My doctor suggested I try the pump (he
tried for eight
years!), but at first I didn't like the idea of
its
catheter--I didn't want to be connected up to a
machine!
Also, I didn't know any other diabetics. But I finally came
around to his point of view. So what did it?
I was a nurse in a hospital diabetic unit then,
and a
person came in from MiniMed (an insulin pump
manufacturer)
to talk to us nurses about the pump. And at that time I
thought, well, gee, this sounds like a pretty
good thing.
But, like I say, it took me eight years to
decide that was
what I wanted to do. My doctor was the one who put the idea
into my head, but I really didn't connect with
it until I
met the MiniMed representative through my work.
When I made the decision to try the pump, 10
years ago,
I was taking approximately three to four shots a
day, and my
blood sugars were not doing well. Every time I went to the
doctor, he would change my sliding scale. I tried-- but it
just seemed like I couldn't figure out how to
get my blood
sugars even.
It was just up and down all the time, with
A1c's of 8 or 9. And I was still feeling ok, but I just
couldn't get the tight control that would be
good for a
diabetic.
That has changed now.
Back when I started, I felt like the pump was
some kind
of secret thing. I tried to find diabetics who were using a
pump, and I couldn't find them. When I did find some, these
individuals weren't that interested in
discussing it with
me, for some reason. Now, there are a lot of new users, so
it is far easier to find someone to talk to; but
I truly
believe that people who use the pump should
share their
knowledge, help spread the word.
The pump is a very simple device. It holds a reservoir
of insulin, and a pump that dispenses a tiny
amount of
insulin, every few minutes, according to how you
set it. It
dispenses two ways: the basal rate and the bolus.
The
basal rate is the basic 24 hours a day
"floor;" but it
doesn't have to be the same rate each hour of
the day. You
can change it for different hours of the 24-hour
period, at
certain times of the day when you need more or
less insulin.
The basal rate means if you don't eat anything
at all for 24
hours, with this insulin pump your basal rate
will still
give you normal blood sugars. Now that is the ideal. And
that will occur. If I don't eat anything for 24 hours, but
my basal rates are set correctly, I will not run
into
trouble.
I can have normal blood sugars for that period. A
person on multiple injections cannot do this,
but a pump
user can.
I use quick-acting Humalog in my pump. And, like I
say, there's no back-up insulin to take over if
something
happens with the pump. (NOTE: Wise pump users
keep an
insulin vial and syringe available, in case the
pump
malfunctions.)
But if my pump is working correctly, as it
does for most of the time, and if I don't eat
for 24 hours,
my blood sugar will stay normal at my basal
rate. And I
also have multiple basal rates to choose from
(my basal rate
doesn't stay the same all the time), as it
depends on my
blood sugars and on the Dawn Phenomenon (the
early morning
blood sugar rise).
The other insulin dose a pump dispenses is
called the
bolus, and it is the specific dose of insulin
you give
yourself to cover a specific meal. Depending on how many
grams of carbohydrates you eat at each meal, you
set your
pump to give yourself a specific bolus of
insulin. My bolus
is 1 unit per 15 carbs. And then I also include my protein
in that, along with my carbohydrates. So the number of
carbohydrates I have in the protein, and the
number of
carbohydrates I have in the meal, I will count
up, and then
give myself a bolus equal to 1/15 the number of
carbohydrate grams consumed, for breakfast and
lunch. And
then for dinner it's 20 carbs for 1 unit. It doesn't depend
on the number of calories. It depends on the number of
carbohydrates.
There are a few things on the pump that are
really
great.
My pump has a light on it, so if you're in a movie
or something and you want to see what you're
bolusing you
can do that.
And there is a feature called a "Square Wave
Bolus," which is what you can bolus in over
a period of
time. If
you eat a meal heavy in fats, it takes you longer
to digest, so you use a square wave bolus over a
longer
period of time.
You can have the bolus go in over two hours
rather than all at once. And there is also a temporary
basal rate, which means if you're exercising, or
if your
blood sugars are too high, or if you're sick,
you can put in
a temporary basal rate, and increase your basal
rate over a
certain period of time, too, for certain
hours. That's only
temporary, and then you can bring it back to
what your
normal rates are.
I test my blood sugars a minimum of six times a
day.
You want to do it a lot, because you need to set
your basals
and your boluses right. I can get by with four, but I
prefer doing it six because it helps me know
what I'm doing.
And it helps me be able to regulate my pump
correctly. You
have to do that.
Remember, the pump is just a mechanical device,
and you
are still the one in control behind the
pump. It's not
automatic, controlling the settings. If you're not going to
do the finger sticks, I would say a minimum of
four times a
day, it's real hard to do the pump. And another thing, you
know I've been sticking my fingers for a long
time, and it
doesn't bother me anymore. I know a lot of
people who it
really bothers.
But it's just a part of me, like my diet is
part of me.
I get discouraged at times, like every diabetic,
and
it's not easy.
The pump takes a while to learn in the first
place.
But you have to realize that it's more like a normal
pancreas
than shots are. The pump works
like a normal
pancreas, more or less. Now if they could get the blood
sugars somehow connected to the pump, that would
be a big
plus.
Someday!
If people think about the pump, and wonder if it
might
be right for them, and they really don't know anything
about it, I think that they need to call the
manufacturer
(MiniMed or Disetronic) and get some
information. The best
thing is to meet somebody who uses it, and at
least look at
it.
Remember, I never saw it in the
eight years I wanted
to be on it.
I wear my pump on my waist. I just clip it on. And
there are different things you can attach it to,
but most of
the time nobody can really see it. It stays on 24 hours a
day and I change it about every two to three
days. I use
the Sof-Set, a small Teflon catheter.
It's not a needle.
They have different ones. It goes into the skin at an
angle.
The needle goes in, and you pull the needle out and
the Teflon catheter stays in your skin. And then you just
tape it down then and you're set. You don't even feel it
when it's in there.
The pump costs a lot, but I think a lot of times
that
insurance will cover it. But if they don't,
sometimes
different companies will support you. I did read someplace
that the companies are getting more involved in
having
payments being made. The company will pay for
it up-front
and the patient can pay them back or something
like that.
I'm not exactly sure what it is. I know there are a lot of
people who can't afford the pump.
The pump is not just for type 1 diabetics. There are
a lot of Type 2's who take a pill every day, and
think their
diabetes is under control. They take one blood sugar test a
day and think that this is fine. It's terrible, it's just
awful. I
see this, because I belong to a pump support
group.
And that's real important, too, for people to belong
to a pump group.
I've been very happy with the pump. Can't imagine
going back to shots again. Intensive insulin therapy is
probably what the next best thing would be.
You still have to be in very good contact with
your
doctor and your educator. This is really important--to get
those basals right, because the basal is like
the foundation
of the house.
If your basals aren't right, you don't have
good control.
For more information, contact the insulin pump
manufacturers:
Disetronic Medical Systems, Inc: 5151 Program
Avenue,
St. Paul, MN 55112; telephone: 1-800-280-7801; fax: (612)
671-6061; website: http://www.disetronic-usa.com
Minimed Technologies, Inc.: 12744 San Fernando
Road,
Sylmar, CA 91342; telephone: 1-800-933-3322; website:
http://www.minimed.com
AN OPEN LETTER TO READERS
by Marc Maurer, President, National Federation
of the Blind
Photo:
portrait. Caption: Marc Maurer
From the VOICE Editor: This article first appeared in
the Braille Monitor, Volume 43, No. 2, February
2000,
published by the National Federation of the Blind (NFB).
Because diabetes is the biggest producer of new
blindness in
the United States, the NFB is the principal
funding source
for VOICE OF THE DIABETIC. The following message is well
worth your consideration.
As many of you know, during the final months of
his
life Dr. Jernigan devoted much of his creative
energy and
imagination to planning an exciting new facility
to be built
on our property at 1800 Johnson Street, which he
named the
National Research and Training Institute for the
Blind. A
little more than 20 years ago, when we first
began
renovating the turn-of-the-century factory
building that we
intended to transform into the National Center
for the Blind
and the headquarters of the National Federation
of the
Blind, many of us found it hard to imagine that
we could
ever use all the space available in the
block-long building.
We told each other that rent income from the
unused areas
would help us meet day-to-day operating
expenses.
Through these past two decades our dreams have
expanded
to keep pace with our growing strength and
experience as an
organization. The Materials Center and all the
publications,
literature, and equipment it stores and ships;
the
International Braille and Technology Center;
NEWSLINE for
the Blind; bedrooms for visiting groups; and the
expanding
staff to meet the demands of a growing
organization: all
these have been added and require significant
space to
operate.
Now the unimaginable has come to pass. We have
just
about run out of space for the programs we are
already
conducting.
More to the point, our dreams of finding ways
to use our experience and expertise to improve
programs and
increase opportunity for all blind people demand
expanded
space if we are to carry out the training and
research that
must be done.
Dr. Jernigan saw all this coming; that is why he
conceived the plan to erect a new building. We
have
dedicated ourselves to bringing his dream and
our own to
fruition. We have embarked on an ambitious
capital campaign
to raise 18 million dollars during the next two
years.
Never before have we taken on a program as
demanding as this
one, but we have now begun discussing our plans
and hopes
with foundations, corporations, and wealthy
individuals as
we make contacts with organizations and people
who might be
interested in helping us make our dreams
reality.
Federationists have never been content to ask
others to
do all the work for us. We may not have millions ourselves,
but we have always taken pride in doing whatever
we can to
bring our dreams to fruition. The entire Board
of Directors
have now made five-year personal pledges toward
our campaign
goal, and many other Federation leaders and
rank-and-file
members have begun planning their gifts.
The time has come for all Federation members and
friends to learn more about our plans in order
to determine
what they can do to help. Perhaps you have friends or
family members who would be interested in making
a gift.
Perhaps you have contacts that we should know
about. I hope
that each of you will plan to make a significant
gift, and I
know many of you will. What is significant? That
depends
on your personal resources and
responsibilities. The
Research and Training Institute will allow us to
affect the
lives of blind people in ways we have never
before dared to
attempt.
A gift, no matter what its size, generous enough
to cause strain on your personal budget, will
honor both Dr.
Jernigan's memory and you.
I ask each of you to take some time to reflect
on who
you know and what you might do to assist in this
ambitious
campaign.
You can contact Vince Connelly, who is working on
this project, if you have ideas or
information. Call (410)
659-9314 and ask for Mr. Connelly. I hope you will use the
pledge form printed at the end of the article to make your
personal gift and send it to NRTI Project, 1800
Johnson
Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
So that you have a complete picture of
opportunities,
here is a brief description of gift
possibilities:
Contributors may choose to have their gifts
recognized
through dedication to one of the Institute's
Initiatives or
through naming opportunities associated with
specific
floors, wings, rooms, facilities, equipment, or
furnishings
of the National Research and Training Institute. Please
contact the NFB Capital Campaign Office for more
information
on specific naming opportunities.
The Wall of Honor:
A permanent wall display listing individual
donors
above the $5,000 level will further recognize
contributors.
All contributors, including those below $5,000,
will be
listed in the appropriate gift level on the
Campaign Honor
Roll to be announced and published during the
campaign
victory celebrations.
Gift Amount
Title
$1,000,000+
Jernigan Circle, Master Builder
$ 500,000+ President's Circle, Program Builder
$
250,000+ Director's Circle,
Opportunity Builder
$
100,000+ Leader's Circle,
Independence Builder
$
50,000+ Patrons
$
25,000+ Partners
$
10,000+ Benefactors
$
5,000+ Fellows
$ <
4,999 Friends
What follows is the text of a document that
briefly
describes the initiatives and programs we expect
to
undertake as the result of this capital
campaign. I hope
that the plans will kindle your imagination and
fuel your
dreams.
Join us in making the future our own.
The Campaign to Change What It Means to Be Blind
Vision for the Future
The spirit and passionate dedication of the over
50,000
members of the NFB are directed toward building
a future for
the blind in this country that includes
opportunity for
education, employment, and full participation in
our
society.
Our message is one of hope and personal
responsibility.
We are determined to demonstrate that blind
people can achieve and prosper, if trained using
a
philosophy of blindness that emphasizes capacity
and mutual
support.
We envision a new approach to helping blind
people--an approach which transcends ancient
images of
darkness, ignorance, and isolation. We foresee a revolution
in services for the blind which views blindness
as a
characteristic to be dealt with through the
acquisition of
pragmatic skills and self- acceptance. We are a people with
abilities and dreams, a people of hope and
tenacity, too
long held down by our own and others'
misconceptions and
fears.
We are working toward a time when all of us can
achieve to our capacity and contribute fully to
our society.
The next chapter of blind people's struggle for
full
integration into all aspects of our society will
include the
nation's first research and training institute
inspired and
operated by the organized blind. We have long known who we
are; now it is time to demonstrate and implement
model
programs and services that will forever change
what it means
to be blind.
The National Research and Training Institute for
the Blind
A new five-story, 170,000-square-foot building
will be
attached to the present national headquarters of
the NFB,
located in Baltimore, Maryland. The new facility will
include a research library, technology training
labs,
classrooms, a distance learning center, an
adaptive
technology development center, and office and
flexible
meeting space.
We have begun an 18-million-dollar capital
campaign.
Funds are being solicited from members and
individual supporters of the NFB, corporations,
foundations,
and governmental sources. The goal is to raise the needed
funds by summer 2001 and to complete the project
in the
summer of 2003.
At least 50 percent of this country's 1.1
million blind
citizens will be directly affected by the
programs,
research, and technology developed during the
first ten
years of the Institute's operation:
* Through the use of newly developed distance
learning
technologies and training methods, we will work
toward
providing an opportunity for all of the 57,000
blind
children in this country to learn Braille and
other
needed skills.
* The 788,000 blind seniors today, and the
projected 1.6
million by 2015 and 2.4 million by 2030, will
have
access to improved services and resources
stimulated by
the senior initiatives of the Institute.
* Partnerships between private-sector employers
and the
NFB will result in lowering the 74 percent
unemployment
rate among working-age blind people in this
country.
* Non-visual speech and Braille technology will
be
developed, making it possible for the blind to
access
an ever-increasing number of services and
resources
delivered by computer technology.
Major Initiatives
The following initiatives will provide the structure
for the programs, projects, and services of the
National
Research and Training Institute for the Blind.
Technology Access and Training Initiative
Technology is a critical element in both
education and
employment opportunities today and will be even
more so in
the future, for the blind just as for the
general public.
Advances in speech, Braille, and large-print
access
technology lead some to assume that the blind
now have or
soon will have access to nearly all of what
technology has
to offer.
Unfortunately, due to the widespread obsession
with
visual design in technology, the shortage of
good technology
training, the cost of equipment, and the rapid
advancements
of technology applications, blind people now
face the
dismaying prospect of being left out if
non-visual access is
not continually updated and improved. This means that
advances in software and hardware must include
design that
allows non-visual access.
The Institute will be the center of
technological
advancement for the blind. Along with
development and
promotion of adaptive technology, training will
be provided
to ensure that the blind move smoothly with
their sighted
peers into the emerging technological age and do
not become
casualties of what Bill Gates has called the
digital divide.
Blind Children's Initiative
The 57,000 legally blind children in this
country face
unique educational and daily-living
challenges. Today the
majority of blind children have other
disabilities, are
educated in public schools rather than
residential schools
for the blind, and have other individualized
needs.
Blind children are often discouraged from using
alternative reading and travel methods because
uninformed
parents and teachers believe that as far as
possible their
children should avoid being labeled as
blind. For too long
these useful tools of independence have been
associated with
the negative stereotype of the hopeless,
isolated blind.
Unfortunately this has resulted in less than 10
percent of
blind children being able to read Braille and
many not being
able to travel independently.
Because the NFB knows that alternative skills
are basic
to self-esteem among the blind and to successful
employment
(today 85 percent of blind people who use
Braille are
employed), we have already directed significant
resources
toward changing this alarming trend. By establishing a
national Braille literacy campaign, promoting
early mobility
training for young blind children, and
contributing to
development of adaptive technology, the NFB has
led the way
in innovation and change. However, because many school
districts are hiring only general special
education teachers
rather than specially trained teachers of the
blind,
families face a growing shortage of qualified
educators and
services for their blind children.
Braille Literacy Initiative
In 1968, 40 percent of blind children in this
country
read Braille, 45 percent read large print, and
only 9
percent read neither. However, today less than 10 percent
of legally blind children read Braille, and more
than 40
percent read neither Braille nor large
print. This problem
reflects a dangerous trend: the functional illiteracy of
tens of thousands of blind children.
In the 1970's, blind children began to be
mainstreamed
into regular classrooms. Most school systems did not know
how to teach children Braille, so they tried to
teach the
children using any method available. For blind children
this meant listening and memorizing; they never
learned to
read and write.
For those with some sight, it meant the use
of magnifiers.
Imagine trying to learn how to read when you
can see only one letter at a time. The result has been
predictable:
many blind children have fallen behind in
school and as adults are now significantly limited.
For too long Braille has been associated with
total
blindness and many of the misconceptions
associated with
this disability. Parents of blind children are easily
convinced that, if their child has some residual
vision
(even if that vision is minimal, unstable, or
likely to
deteriorate), reading print will somehow mean
their child is
not really blind. It takes people who are positive about
Braille and familiar with the real benefits of
this
alternative technique to convince reluctant
parents. Also
much work is necessary to upgrade the Braille
skills of
teachers of the blind and to improve
Braille-production and
Braille-teaching technology.
The National Research and Training Institute
will be
the center of a growing Braille Literacy
Initiative that
will ensure that the progress led by the NFB
continues and
that Braille is recognized to be a
communications tool as
essential to the blind as American Sign Language
is to the
deaf.
Research Initiative
Despite the tremendous outlay of public and
private
funds throughout most of the decades of this
century, the
objective situation of the blind as a group
remains
intractably bleak: 74 percent unemployment, functional
illiteracy for tens of thousands of blind
children, and
exclusion from the mainstream of society. These
facts make
it starkly clear that the techniques and systems
used to
serve the blind in the United States are in dire
need of
overhaul.
The unsolved problems demand innovative
solutions.
Effective training programs that will teach the
professors
who will teach the teachers and other
professionals who will
teach the blind must be developed so that the
age-old cycle
of dependency and despair can be broken. The Research
Initiative of the National Research and Training
Institute
will focus on identifying and solving the root
causes of
these endemic problems.
Blind Seniors Initiative
Less money is spent and fewer services are
available to
those over 55 losing vision than to younger
blind people.
Yet far more people lose vision after retirement
age than
before.
New approaches must be developed and taught to
state and local staff members in rehabilitation,
older
blind, and older Americans programs and in
centers for
independent living. The National Research and Training
Institute will bring together knowledgeable
professionals
who will design materials and develop training
programs to
assist state and local agencies in helping blind
and
visually impaired seniors remain independent and
continue to
participate in the activities they hope for in
their
retirement years. Blindness can happen to anyone. Without
training and opportunity it can be
devastating. In short,
seniors have huge needs. The Blind Seniors Initiative of
the National Research and Training Institute
will focus on
finding ways to meet them.
Employment Initiative
Work is one of the fundamental ways in which
individuals express their talents, make a
contribution, and
take responsibility for themselves. For too long many blind
people have been told by their families,
teachers, and even
rehabilitation counselors that the world of
competitive
employment is most likely out of reach for them.
Since its founding in 1940, the NFB has been
committed
to the principle that otherwise-able blind
people should be
expected to work and should be given every
opportunity to
achieve.
This means that the blind must believe in
themselves and employers must learn that
qualified blind
people make productive, loyal employees.
With an unemployment rate of 74 percent, many
working-
age blind people are not enjoying the challenges
and
responsibilities of competitive employment.
Although
hundreds of millions of dollars have been
invested in job-
preparation programs around the country, this
staggering
number has not changed in recent years. The employment
initiative of the National Research and Training
Institute
will provide focus, resources, and direction for
a
comprehensive evaluation of contemporary methods
for helping
the blind.
From such an evaluation will come the necessary
knowledge to develop, demonstrate, and replicate
innovative
training programs to replace existing efforts
which have
failed to bring the blind into the workforce.
The new National Research and Training Institute
will
be the center of research, demonstrations, and
job-
development partnerships with private
industry. These
partnerships in combination with successful
employment
preparation programs will create national
momentum toward
the full employment of the blind.
The Campaign To Change What It Means To Be Blind
Capital Campaign Pledge Intention
Name:______________________________________________________
Home
Address:______________________________________________
Address:___________________________________________________
City, State, and
Zip:______________________________________
Home Phone:_________________ Work Phone:_________________
E-mail
Address:____________________________________________
Employer:__________________________________________________
Work
Address:______________________________________________
City, State,
Zip:__________________________________________
To support the priorities of the Campaign, I
(we) pledge the
sum of $________________.
My (our) pledge will be payable in installments
of $
__________ over the next _______ years (we
encourage pledges
paid over 5 years), beginning
____________________, on the
following schedule (check one):
___ annually
___ semi-annually ___
quarterly __ monthly
I (we) have enclosed a down payment of $
________________
____ Gift of stock: ________ shares of
____________________
____ My employer will match my gift.
Please list (my) our names in all Campaign
Reports and on
the Campaign Wall of Honor in the appropriate
Giving Circle
as follows:
___________________________________________________________
___ I (We) wish to remain anonymous.
Signed:
_____________________________ Date:
___________
DIABETES: WHERE WE ARE
TODAY, WHERE WE WILL BE TOMORROW
by
Frank Vinicor, MD, MPH
Dr. Vinicor, director of the Division of
Diabetes
Translation at the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control, in
Atlanta, Georgia, gave the following as the
keynote address
at the 1999 annual conference of the Diabetes Action
Network
of the National Federation of the Blind. The conference
took place on July 2, 1999, at the annual
convention of the
National Federation of the Blind, in Atlanta,
Georgia.
I have been here at Centers for Disease Control
for
about ten years. Prior to that time I was at Indiana
University School of Medicine. I'm a card-carrying
endocrinologist and diabetologist. I did clinical work and
clinical studies, and then went to the
University of North
Carolina, to the School of Public Health and received
a
masters in public health, and then I came to the
CDC. I
think many people are wondering why diabetes is
studied at
the CDC.
It is because we do not just study the outbreak of
infectious diseases, like hanta virus or
influenza, but
there's also a lot of activity at the CDC now in
chronic
diseases.
In the United States, probably 70% of health
problems
and their costs are related to chronic illnesses
like heart
disease and diabetes and the like and so there's
a big
program, the Division of Diabetes Translation,
to get all
those research findings out into regular
practice. It's no
longer good enough for people to do research and
publish it
in the professional journals, and just wait for
it to affect
medical practice. Research that isn't applied in daily
practice is research that's wasted. And so, our primary
responsibilities are to actively translate
research into
practice--to take all those articles that
appear, all the
funding research that NIH does, and at the CDC,
translate
them into practice. The public health part of what we do
falls into three main responsibilities:
First is to know something; such as how many
people
have diabetes, how much it costs, what kind of
health
problems people have. We try to figure out the size of the
problem of diabetes. Another thing we do at CDC is try to
know why things are the way they are. For example, why
diabetes is much more common in Hispanic
communities or
African American communities. We know that African
Americans, for example, once they have diabetes,
have more
problems with kidney failure. We now need to know why that
is. That
makes us very different from NIH--because CDC has
a congressional mandate to do something. It isn't just
enough to do the research, but once you have the
answers,
there is a responsibility to develop programs
that make a
difference.
We produce documents. One that's very popular is
called Take Charge of Your Diabetes. It's a very practical,
patient-oriented book, also available, from the
National
Library Service for the Blind and Physically
Handicapped, in
Braille and on audiocassette. That's one example of what we
do.
There's a heck of a lot more that we can and should be
doing.
What I thought I'd do is initially cover four
areas:
one is give you a sense of the size of the
problem of
diabetes in the world, including the United
States. Then
talk in general terms about where we can make a
difference.
What are our choices about where we can make a
difference to
stop some of these problems of diabetes? Then I'll talk
about some of the research directions that
perhaps aren't
right there today, but soon will be. Then I'll just pose
some challenges that I think exist for all of us
in taking
on this thing called diabetes.
In terms of the problems of diabetes in the
United
States, how many people have it? How many people are going
to develop it?
What kind of problems they have?
How many
times do they go see those doctors? What does it cost?
Whatever criteria you want to use, to decide if
a problem is
a big problem, diabetes fits the bill. If you want to think
about how common it is, diabetes, sixteen
million people
have the condition. About five million or so have it, and
don't know it.
Those are accurate figures, but, to me, that
number, "sixteen million," doesn't
grab me in the gut. It's
too big a number. Another way to think about it is, between
when you woke up this morning and when you wake
up tomorrow
morning, there will be slightly over 2000
Americans
diagnosed with diabetes, every day. And that's going to
happen every day of the week. It's going to happen on the
fourth of July, and it's going to happen on the
weekends.
Every day there are going to be about 2000 more
people
diagnosed with diabetes. That's giving you some sense of
how common this is.
The complications of diabetes are also big, and
obviously you have been dealing and wrestling
with the
visual problems. Blindness, kidney failure, and amputations
are three of the big problems, as is heart
disease. Again,
let me give you a flavor of how common these
problems are.
I know this sounds discouraging, but I think we
have to get
a sense of where we are and where we're going,
to appreciate
the importance of good research and good
translation. In
terms of kidney failure, again, between when you
woke up
this morning and when you wake up next morning,
about 70
people will experience kidney failure and will
have entered
kidney failure programs, either going on
dialysis, or
getting a kidney transplant. In terms of amputations,
diabetes will cause, every day, between this
morning and
tomorrow morning, 150 amputations, again, every
day. And
finally, in terms of legal blindness, about 75
people in
this country will go blind, every day, from
diabetes.
That's a lot.
That gives you a flavor.
Every morning you wake up, it will have
happened. So
we're not dealing, obviously, with a rare,
uncommon, or
benign disease.
And we're not dealing with a cheap disease.
Diabetes costs the country about a hundred
billion dollars a
year.
What that means for the individual is, whatever the
average person, who doesn't have diabetes, pays
for
healthcare, people with diabetes will pay three
times that
much.
So, on average again (there are exceptions where
people are paying more or less), people with
diabetes are
going to be paying roughly $10,000 a year for
their care, or
somebody's going to pay for that. Diabetes is incredibly
expensive.
Now I realize that all of that is discouraging,
but
I've got to stick with this, because I want to
say that it's
not only discouraging in the United States, but
it's
becoming very discouraging throughout the
world. In a study
that we did at the CDC with the World Health
Organization,
we know that right now there are approximately
125 million
people with diabetes in the world. By the year 2025, only
25 years from now, there will be 300 million
people with
diabetes.
Most, almost all, of those people will be type 2.
The reasons why this explosion in the number of
people with
diabetes are several.
Lifestyle is certainly one of them. All of us are less
active and getting heavier. In the United States, obesity,
improper nutrition, and increased television
watching are
all epidemic.
So, one of them is our behaviors.
The second
one has to do with what are called demographics;
changes in
the population.
Generally, people, even in developing
countries, are not dying of childhood diseases
as much as
they used to.
And that's a wonderful accomplishment.
They're not dying of diarrhea, or dehydration,
or measles,
or the like.
And so, on average, countries' populations are
getting older, so more people are reaching an
age where
diabetes is more common. Another factor is that in the
United States there are populations who are particularly
prone to get diabetes; we're talking about
African
Americans, American Indians, Hispanics, Alaskan
natives and
Pacific Islanders. Those populations are growing at a rate
considerably higher than the white population,
such that by
approximately 2050 AD, the minority populations
would be, in
the aggregate (all of them together), about the
same
percentage as the white population. So another reason why
diabetes is growing, in terms of prevalence, how
many people
have it now, is because those populations that
really face a
greater challenge from diabetes are increasing
at greater
number.
So we've got all our behaviors, and we've got these
demographic changes.
Also there's another major factor which accounts
for
why we know that diabetes is going to be a
bigger problem.
And it has to do with the word ascertainment,
which means
accurately obtaining data. Diabetes has always been a big
problem, but the systems that collect
information on various
diseases haven't been collecting information on
diabetes
very well.
For example, if you take 100 people who have
diabetes, and they know they have diabetes, and
they're in
the health care system, the system knows they
have diabetes,
and they die, only 40 of them will have diabetes
listed
anywhere on their death certificate. In terms of looking at
mortality, death, as an indicator of how bad a
condition is,
we have been underestimating the contribution of
diabetes to
that indicator of health. Likewise, if you look at people
who have diabetes, they know they have diabetes,
they're in
the hospital, and you look at the discharge
summary, 40% of
those people will not have diabetes listed on
the hospital
discharge summary--there'll be no record of the
role their
diabetes played in putting them there.
That's all changing now. Our systems of collecting
information are getting a lot better, and we're
not missing
the problems of diabetes. So when we put all those things
together, our general view about diabetes is
that things are
going to get worse before they get better--in
terms of the
number of people and the kind of problems. Now, that's the
first part, and I know that's discouraging, but
I wanted to
get it out of the way. Because if you ask yourself:
Are we
locked into this scenario? Is there nothing we can do today
about diabetes?
Is it inevitable that things are going to
get bad and it's going to happen like clockwork
and there's
nothing we can do? The answer is no, no, no, no and again,
no. We
are not "stuck." There are
things we can do today
for diabetes.
Let me just mention three general areas of what
we can
do for diabetes today. Let's talk about what we now call
type 2 diabetes. We used to use the term "adult onset",
then we started using the term
"non-insulin-dependent
diabetes" and now we use the term
"type 2". And what we're
talking about typically is the situation in
which the
individual is "over, under,
over". Over forty, underactive,
overweight.
Type 2 probably accounts, in the United States,
for
about 90% of diabetes. We now know that for type 2 diabetes
that there may be an approximately ten-year time
period, on
average, between when somebody develops type 2
diabetes and
when it is diagnosed clinically. In other words, people
with type 2 diabetes will typically go, on
average, one
decade with the condition, with the high blood
sugar, and
the bad things that can happen with the high
blood sugar, so
at time of the diagnosis of type 2, about a
third of these
"new" diabetics will already have
preventable complications
of diabetes.
One thing we can do to stop this from happening,
is to
try to identify people earlier, before we
clinically make
the diagnosis.
When the condition is present, but maybe
there aren't symptoms, or the symptoms don't
suggest
diabetes, we need to have a good look. For example, VOICE
editor Ed Bryant mentioned that he's 54. I'm four years
older than he is, I'm 58. If I woke up in the middle of the
night a couple of times and had excessive
urination, I
probably wouldn't think first about
diabetes. I'd wonder
about my prostate gland. Or, if for my age, I started
having some visual blurring, I probably wouldn't
think about
diabetes, necessarily. I might think about cataracts or
something like that, 'cause I'm getting up there
in age.
So, even for people who have these symptoms of
diabetes,
they don't necessarily know they ought to be
tested for it.
So, one of the things that we're doing in the
United States,
is trying to develop a reasonable early
screening program.
One requires a simple blood test. It's not expensive. It's
not particularly painful. Particularly, if you have
diabetes in your family, if you're overweight,
if you're
from minority groups. Trying to find diabetes earlier and
start treatment earlier to prevent the
complications is one
thing that we all can do together.
The second thing that we can do together is to
ensure
access.
I think it's an embarrassment in this country, that
when diabetes is discovered, many people still
don't have
access to quality care. And particularly at a time when
this country economically is doing very well,
particularly
at a time when the unemployment rate is down to
3 1/2 to 4%,
particularly at a time when certain people are
bringing in
huge amounts of money, the fact that the number
of people
who are uninsured, who don't have financial
coverage for
health care, is going up. I just find that unacceptable. I
personally think that's ethically unacceptable,
from a
social justice standpoint. So, I believe we need to ensure
that when people have their diabetes discovered,
they in
fact get access to good care. That's the second thing we
can do.
The third thing we can do is insure, once
diabetes is
discovered, that you get care of appropriate
quality. Now
let me explain what I mean by that. We now know, and have
good, excellent studies, solid scientific and
economic
studies that show that if you control your blood
sugar
pretty well, if you control your blood pressure
pretty well,
and if you control your blood lipids, your blood
fats,
pretty well, you do not have to go blind,
develop kidney
failure, or develop heart disease. We also know now that if
you have diabetes, and you find retinopathy, eye
changes,
early, or if you find early kidney changes, such
as a little
protein in the urine, or for example you use the
little
monofilament to test your feet, this little
plastic
monofilament that is very, very inexpensive,
costs about 10
cents, and can be used repeatedly, that tells
you if you
have what's called an insensate foot, a foot
that's lost its
sensation; if you find that out, and you wear
protective
shoeing, we now have studies that show you don't
have to
have a foot ulcer or an amputation.
We don't need to "prove it." We have the proof. And
so what I'm saying is that quality of care is
our most
potent weapon today to prevent those very things
from
occurring.
I believe strongly that with good care we don't
need to see 75 people go blind every day, 70
people enter
kidney failure programs or 150 amputations a
day.
The real challenge is to ensure that people get
access
to quality care. That's not an easy challenge, but with the
private sector and the public sector empowering
people with
diabetes, all of that is coming together to make
a
difference.
So even though I do believe that things are
going to get worse, I think we all contain the
power to make
that period of getting worse short.
With the knowledge we have today, we can move
forward,
and make a difference. But let me go on, and talk a little
bit about research. I love reading the VOICE.
I'm glad Ed
keeps sending me a copy of it. You all have your own
contacts, you all obviously are very energetic
about your
interest in diabetes. I've heard already here about your
awareness about the pumps and the non-invasive
monitors.
You're currently on the cutting edge of
this. But let me
share my sense of the research area.
Now, if I see somebody, an individual with
diabetes,
and I really want to do something to help that
person, I've
only got three choices. I could prevent diabetes. That's
one choice.
The second choice is that once they have it I
could cure it.
And the third choice I have is to do the
best job that I can, to care for them. So let me share with
you a little bit about what's going on in the
research
field, in each of those categories. What are we doing, what
do we know, where are we, in terms of trying to
prevent
diabetes.
Where are we and what do we know and what do we
not know about trying to cure it, and then where
are we in
trying to do a better job in caring for it.
So let's first talk about preventing diabetes.
Wouldn't it be great if we didn't have to worry
about
diabetic retinopathy and blindness because we
didn't develop
diabetes in the first place? It'd be wonderful. What do we
know about preventing type 1 diabetes? We know a lot. And
there are studies going on now to try to prevent
type 1
diabetes.
I don't know about you, but when I was a young
man, which seems like years ago, in medical
school, I was
always taught that the person with type 1
diabetes was
healthy on Tuesday, and on Wednesday was sick as
could be.
That type 1 diabetes was a sudden-onset
condition, that
would develop in 24 hours, and could be lethal
unless you
got treatment for your acidosis.
We don't think that anymore. We now hold a completely
different view of type 1 diabetes. We know that as many as
10 to 15 years before the clinical onset of type
1, for
whatever reason, the body starts to see its own
insulin-
producing cells as foreign, "not
mine," and starts setting
up an immune destructive response, one that goes
on and on
and on and destroys the insulin-producing beta
cells.
Eventually it kills off enough of the one million
beta cells
we have in our body that you develop type 1
diabetes. That
process can take 10 years. Furthermore, we know that by
doing certain genetic studies, you can identify
people who
are at risk for this condition, and further, if
you do
measurements of proteins in the body that are
directed
against the insulin producing cells, you can
actually
predict very accurately who, within a year or
two, will
develop type 1 diabetes, unless something is
done. That's
all new information in the last five to 10
years.
There are now three major studies identifying
people
who have this genetic marker; people who have
these
antibodies present, directed against their own
insulin
producing cells. Now they don't have diabetes, their blood
sugars are normal--but these three major studies
are trying
to stop the immune destruction, to try to stop
that sort of
self-destructive process in the person's own
body that is
the onset of type 1 diabetes. One of the studies is called
"The Diabetes Prevention Trial Type
1." It's going on in
the United States. The second study is called E.N.D.I.T.,
the "European Nicotinamide Diabetes
Intervention Trial." In
this, researchers are giving this compound
nicotinamide to
people at risk for developing type 1 diabetes,
to try to
stop the destructive super-oxygenation that goes
on when the
Beta cells are attacked. And the third study, just coming
out of Scandinavia, is called the TRIGGER
Study. The
important point is that these big multi-center
studies will
probably come up with some answers, by 2002 or
2003, as to
whether or not we can prevent type 1 diabetes.
What about type 2 diabetes? All of us know that type 2
diabetes occurs in people who are "over,
under, over." What
happens if we can find people who are at risk
for type 2
diabetes?
What we look for is people who have what we call
impaired glucose tolerance. If you test their blood sugars,
their values aren't yet in the diabetes range,
but they're
above normal.
Can we stop those people from getting more
"over, under, over?" We can't do much about their age, but
the underactive or overweight? What if we can do something
about those two? Right now there are two or three studies,
the biggest one, being the Diabetes Prevention
Program Type
2, in which about 6000 people identified with
impaired
glucose tolerance are being randomly assigned to
either
continue very mild activity or behavioral
interventions or
also to receive the oral medication
Metformin. Now these
folks don't have diabetes, but the idea is to
see whether
development of diabetes can be stopped, to
prevent type 2
diabetes.
That study is going on at many locations. Its a
25-center study, and those results will also be out in
about the year 2002.
So current research has gone beyond basic
understanding, test tube research, etc., to
intervention
trials.
It may mean that by the time you meet three years
from now there'll be exciting news about whether
type 1 or
type 2 diabetes can be prevented.
There are now increasing amounts of type 2
diabetes in
children.
Most of us have been trained to think about type
2 diabetes as "over, under, over",
over 40, underactive,
overweight.
And if I told you I had someone who was 14
years old and had diabetes, you might
automatically think
that person had type 1 diabetes. Particularly in minority
communities, there are now a number of case
series in which
youngsters most often in their 15, 16, 17 year
age range
have full-blown classical type 2 diabetes. Particularly
American Indians, African-Americans and
Hispanics, but cases
are now also being reported in white
communities. Almost
always this condition is associated with being
overweight
and underactive... Interestingly enough, there is often a
very unusual skin condition, called Acathosis
nigricans,
associated with it. "Acathosis" means a thickened, velvety
skin on the back of the neck and
"nigricans" means dark. So
it's a darkened, thickened, velvety skin on the
back of the
neck, in the armpits, etc., associated with this
juvenile
type 2 upsurge.
For all the world, it is type 2 diabetes,
as best we can tell--and it is occurring at age
15 years.
What does that mean? Well, it's really scary, because what
it means is that normally we think of type 2
diabetes on
average occurring at age 50, and we are
wrestling with what
it means to have type 2 diabetes for 30
years. Well, are we
gonna have to start asking the question: "What does it mean
to have type 2 diabetes for 60 years?"
Right now there are several projects addressing
type 2
diabetes in youth. One is through the CDC, to document the
existence of this on a population basis. Another on July 20
and 21, a conference at NIH, will look at some
of the basic
biomedical and biological reasons why this might
be
happening.
The ADA has just issued a position paper.
Everybody is aware of, interested in, and
frightened by this
phenomenon.
Now let's go on to the next area. Where do we stand
with cures?
The whole understanding of curing diabetes has
changed in my lifetime. If the problem of type 1 diabetes
is just losing your insulin-producing cells, why
can't we
just replace those? There are four different types of
studies going on for "curing" type 1
diabetes. Number one
is transplanting the pancreas. The pancreas is a strange
organ. Most
of the pancreas is there not to prevent
diabetes, but to help us digest food. All the enzymes in
your stomach and your intestines come out of the
pancreas,
and in fact the insulin producing cells
represent about .01%
of the pancreas, a very small percentage. But, if we can
transplant hearts and kidneys, why can't we
transplant a
pancreas?
It's tricky, because it's located way in the back
of the abdominal cavity, in front of your spine.
They do now transplant pancreases--not the whole
thing
but what's called the Segment Transplant where
if someone,
for example, has died in an auto or motorcycle
accident,
they can remove the pancreas, a part of it, and
transplant
that.
There have been about,
throughout the world, maybe
10,000 or 12,000, pancreas transplants. Again, it's not
your pancreas so you're gonna have to take some
drugs to
prevent rejection. But some people have had a remarkably
successful experience.
Doctors have actually been doing the whole
pancreas
transplants in some centers, like University of
Minnesota,
for 10-15 years. A number of people have lived that long.
A larger number of people have been transplanted
in the last
three to five years, and generally it's been
quite
successful, both certainly in terms of people
surviving, and
also in terms of the pancreas transplant
functioning well.
What's the success ratio? This we define in two ways. The
most basic is, did the individual live? And the second one
is, did the transplanted pancreas live? And for the
individual, you go out three, four, five years,
probably 95%
of the people are still alive. So the success of the
pancreas transplant depends on how you define
the word. If
you define that as going completely off insulin,
that's a
pretty rigorous definition. Generally speaking, the
pancreases seem to work three to five years out,
in the
range of 70-80%. It's a pretty high success rate as things
go.
Who is eligible for a pancreas transplant? In general,
the criteria are that if you need a kidney transplant, and
you're going to be exposed to immunosuppressive
medications,
lets go ahead and try to do a pancreas
transplant at the
same time.
There's a little bit of "opening up" now; some
people now are just having a pancreas
transplant. If you
have a kidney and a pancreas transplant,
Medicare has just
decided they would pay for that.
The likelihood of rejection, that the body will
reject
the new foreign organ, is about the same for a
pancreas as
it is for a kidney. There are a lot of new, less toxic,
medications coming out to prevent rejection, and
that's
encouraging.
A person with a kidney transplant, already
taking
immunosuppressants, might well be eligible. It depends on
individual circumstances.
There was a question about diabetic coma and its
effect
on transplants.
There are three types of diabetic coma.
One is when you have what's called acidosis
which for type 1
is where the pH number, the measure of acid in
your body,
gets so low that you can go into coma. There's another kind
of coma, where the blood sugar gets so high,
that in the
absence of acidosis you can go into coma. And then there is
the low blood sugar coma. Those don't really affect the
success of transplantation, in and of themselves.
Let me go on and tell you about three other
choices
that we might have in the near future. I spoke about
transplanting a chunk of the pancreas, like half
of it.
Another choice we have, since I said the
insulin-producing
cells make up such a small amount of the
pancreas, like
.01%, is to get just the insulin producing
cells. What
we're talking about is Islet Cell
Transplantation. It is
possible now to collect those, such that you can
sort of
slice up the donated pancreas, and quickly and
pretty easily
collect those.
It turns out that you don't need a million
insulin producing cells--to not get diabetes,
you need a lot
less.
Somebody was smart, and put in some reserve, I guess.
You probably need 100,000, maybe 200,000 at
most, to get
away from diabetes and you can get those
cells. A number of
centers are doing studies, not transplanting the whole
pancreas, but the islets, the insulin-producing
cells
themselves.
The new islets are injected into a vein, with a
regular
syringe.
Most often they go into the liver and set up
housekeeping there. It's technically not a big deal, but
the body is just so darn smart, so much smarter
than we are.
It even knows about these little cells, and the
body's smart
enough to say, "they ain't mine." The body again will try
to reject these.
There are a couple of ways people are trying to
stop
this rejection.
One of them is to again give various
immunosuppressant drugs, just like you do for
kidney
transplant or whatever. Again, the drugs are getting
better; they're getting less toxic, more
effective. Another
tack they're trying is to use engineering
techniques. They
put these little insulin producing cells inside
something
like a straw, a small straw, with small holes,
big enough to
let sugar come in and insulin come out. But the holes are
too small to let the destructive proteins, or
the white
blood cells, get in at them. Just two or three weeks ago,
the National Institutes of Health made a
decision to devote
$125 million to a project to do clinical trials
on islet
cell transplantation. That means moving along, outside of
the laboratories.
Because of the location of the pancreas, and
because
you only have one, at this point in time new
islet cells
must come from cadavers only. Now there are studies going
that are looking at fetal islet cells, but that
raises a lot
of ethical questions, about abortion and
studying fetuses.
But fetal islets are viewed as less formed; some
people are
doing studies on transplanting pig islets,
because pig
insulin is only different from human insulin by
one little
amino acid.
So what works right now is cadaver transplants-
-but this second way of just transplanting the
islets is now
going to be big time with this $125 million.
The clinical trial just started; they just made
the
decision last week. There'll be advertisements coming out
about 800 numbers to call. A lot of information will be
published shortly.
I mentioned about the whole pancreas. I talked about
the islets.
We're pretty smart. I mean we
can send people
to the moon and all that kind of stuff... Why
can't we make
an artificial pancreas? In fact, we can make two out of the
three parts really well, and we've been able to
do that for
ten years.
We know how to make a little reservoir to store
insulin right below the skin. That's a piece of cake. We
know how to make pumps to squirt out
insulin. A lot of
people have been doing that for years. The third necessary
part, which we are really struggling with, is that
interactive sugar sensor. To get a glucose sensor, a sugar
sensor, that will last more than a few days, and
will give
us accurate readings, there is much effort in
the private
sector.
Pump manufacturer MiniMed just got FDA approval to
do some work with their sensor. All of that is so exciting
in terms of completing the third of the three
parts.
Right now, if you wanted an artificial pancreas,
some
exist in experimental units. They probably weigh about 200
pounds.
You could carry that on your back, you know, like a
backpack and walk around. But the first two parts, the
insulin reservoir and the pump, they've been
miniaturized,
they're failsafe. No big deal. But until we
can get that
glucose sensor thing worked out (and they've
made a lot of
strides), we're not going to be able to do
that. I predict
that within two years there will be a reliable
group of
sensors that will last for a long time. And then we'll have
this artificial pancreas that may be the size of
a cassette
player or something. It'll probably be ultimately internal,
"internal" being right below the skin.
Why do we have to depend on islet cells? I mentioned
that they're hard to get. The pancreas is way in the back
of the belly.
It is a pain to get at it. But
we do genetic
research today.
Most of the insulin that you're using (if
you inject) isn't produced by a human. We've tricked some
bacteria into making human insulin. Why can't we trick fat
cells, for example, or muscle cells, to make
human insulin.
Why can't we take the human insulin gene and
insert it into
a human cell, and have it produce human
insulin? This
fourth source of insulin replacement would be to
take non-
insulin-producing cells, insert the insulin
gene, have it
produce insulin, and then inject those cells
into the body.
You could take somebody's own fat cells and do
that, and re-
inject it, and not have to worry so much about
rejection,
itself, because it's their own fat cells. They can do that
now; they have the techniques to do that. The challenge is
to be sure those fat cells, or muscle cells that
have been
tricked into producing insulin, turn off the
insulin release
when it should be off and turn it on when it
should go on.
We don't want those cells suddenly putting out a
whole bunch
of insulin, when in fact, my blood sugar is
40. And we do
want it to produce insulin if our blood sugar is
starting to
sneak up.
And that's the part that still hasn't been worked
out yet.
We can make those cells produce insulin, but, are
they sensitive, like our Beta cells? That's the next
challenge.
But within three to four years we're going to
have more choices on curing type 1
diabetes. Pancreas
transplant, islet cell transplant, artificial
pancreas, and
"tricked fat cells."
Some of you have questions about non-invasive
blood
glucose monitoring, and about the Glucowatch
monitoring
system.
There are five or ten different approaches people
are exploring, to measure sugar without having
to prick the
finger, or do a blood test. One of them is on the skin,
where the idea is that, in essence, the skin
juices, like
sweat, will change as your blood glucose
changes, and that
would give you some indication of the
sugar. Another
technique actually uses a Laser beam that
literally, blows a
small hole in your skin. And there are other techniques.
What about the new developments with inhaled
insulin?
We know that we have to take injections. The needles and
syringes have gotten smaller, better,
sharper. We've got
the pen.
We've got pumps. There have been
a number of
studies done to look at how insulin could be
administered,
other than by subcutaneous injection. One was through the
nose, a nasal spray. Another was through a rectal
suppository, but I don't see a lot of enthusiasm for that,
even though it worked. And recently, there have been two or
three studies about inhaled insulin. In other words,
insulin is aerosolized, and it gets down into
the lungs; way
down deep into the lungs. The initial studies with both
type 1 and type 2 diabetes have been very, very
positive, in
terms of the body's ability to absorb insulin;
very, very
positive in terms of the ability to control
blood sugar, but
the concentration that you need to have there is
quite a bit
higher than
U100. U100 means 100 units per
CC; the
concentration is quite a bit higher than
that. But the
studies have been so exciting and so positive
that all of
the major insulin producing companies, Lilly,
Hoechst,
European companies, etc, have an active program
on
developing inhaled insulin. They are now going into other
studies, what are called Phase II and Phase III
trials,
where the number of people involved is greater,
where
they're looking to see what's the effect if I
have a cold or
bronchitis, does that change the absorption of
insulin, for
example.
The initial results are very encouraging. The study
subjects love it. I suspect within a year or two, you'll
see major studies, and probably within three
years or so
you'll begin to see some availability. I don't suspect it
will be available to everybody, as there are
very practical
issues to work out, like if the absorption
doubles when you
go to a humid zone, you probably need to know
that, so you
don't have a hypo... But, the initial experiments are very
positive.
Let's go on and talk a little bit about
caring. I
mentioned preventing and curing Let's talk about caring.
Where are we now with "caring?" Well, we've come a long
way.
I've been in diabetes now for about 30 years, in terms
of my professional life. I don't have diabetes myself. And
I think as bad as it is to get diabetes today,
July 2, 1999,
it is so much better than it was to get diabetes
ten years
ago, let alone 20 or 30 years ago. We have better, purer,
more varied forms of insulin. We now have four, and soon
we'll have six or seven types of oral tablets to
take. We
now have better meters, they're smaller and
cheaper and more
accurate; strips still cost way too much.
But we've got better meters. We now have a way to
ensure that you're not fibbing me when you come
in to see
me.
Everybody who comes in to see me in my office when I
do a blood sugar test when they're there to see
me, it's
beautiful.
And, right before, they stop eating the cake and
they start to exercise...
We now have this test that has dramatically
changed our
understanding of long term control of diabetes,
the A1c or
glycosylated hemoglobin test. That's a major improvement in
our ability to care. The A1c does not show peaks and
valleys, but averages. The A1c will give you your overall
average blood glucose to help you and your
doctor or your
nurse to see how you've been doing.
We now have better ways, for example, to detect
kidney
disease.
We now know that well before kidney tests indicate
kidney diseases, for both type 1 and type
2, if we look at
the urine and detect small amounts of protein in
the urine,
micro-albumin, we now know that's a sign of
very, very early
kidney problems. And we further know that if we use certain
medicines to lower the blood pressure, or to
treat that
protein, the ACE Inhibitors, we know we can
substantially
prevent the development of kidney failure,
regardless of
what the blood sugar is. And if you put those two things
together, you control the blood sugar, the blood
pressure,
and take this medicine to stop the protein, you
really can
prevent kidney failure.
What about the side effects of the ACE
Inhibitors?
With any medicines there are certain side
effects. Some of
them are mild and some of them are severe, but
most of them
are infrequent.
For example, with any blood pressure
medicine you can have what's called postural (or
orthostatic) hypotension. That is, when you first stand up
or sit up, you're getting out of bed or you
stand from a
chair, your blood pressure can fall because your
blood
vessels aren't contracting. That could be one side effect.
Another side effect, you can have problems with
potency.
Almost all blood pressure medicine can interfere
with sexual
function.
One of the special problems with ACE Inhibitors,
very uncommon, is a cough. People can have this cough, that
can't seem to come under control. It's very rare, but when
it happens, it can be a problem. Fortunately, there are
other medicines to take. So those are some of the general
thoughts about the ACE Inhibitors. In general, they are
considered to be pretty darn good and pretty
effective
medicine, especially for people who have
diabetes with a
little bit of protein in the urine.
There are three or four ways to measure the
protein
spillage, microalbumin, that is characteristic
of kidney
disease.
One is a 24-hour urine. Another
test you can do
is called the spot test, where you get a urine
sample and
you look at the amount of protein compared to
the amount of
another substance called creatinine. And then there are a
couple of what's called dipstick tests. We can put a strip
into the urine and see if albumin is
present. We can do
that now, so we can know if your kidneys are
failing early.
For the eyes, we now know what to look for. In this
day and age, only about 40%, 50% of people are
having their
eyes examined well, and at regular
frequencies. We knew
twenty years ago that if you looked in the eyes
and you
found changes and you got laser treatment, that
could help
reduce the likelihood of going blind. We knew that 20 years
ago, but we're still having trouble getting that
done
regularly.
I wanted to cover neuropathy, the nerve damage
produced
by diabetes, the damage done by high blood sugar
on the
nerves, especially in the legs and feet,
sometimes in the
hands.
There are different kinds of neuropathy. But
peripheral neuropathy tends to have different
kinds of signs
and symptoms.
It can manifest itself by having slightly
cold, numb feet. On the other hand, it can be painful, if
different size nerves are affected. Or it can make your
feet so incredibly sensitive that you don't even
want the
bed sheet to touch you. It can be all those things or just
some of them.
The problem with neuropathy is not
necessarily the problems of having it, but also
that it
causes your foot to change shape, to be exposed
to bruises
and bumps that it normally wouldn't be. You can step on a
nail, or a stone, or have your sole of your shoe
double up,
and you don't know it. Pain can be a wonderful thing, in
that it tells you there's something wrong with
your foot.
If you've lost the nerve function, you don't
know it. All
of us in the office have had experiences where
people come
in, we say, "How're things going?" "Great, Any problems
with this that and the other thing?",
"No." You take off
their socks, look at their socks, there is some
pus and
blood, and there's a big hole on the bottom of
the foot.
The people haven't even sensed it and so then
the ulcer is
associated with amputation.
Again, we know that the neuropathy can very much
be
prevented with good sugar control and that there
are
medicines now being studied, such as the Aldose
Reductase
inhibitors, that tend to stop the conversion of
high sugars
into a compound called Sorbitol. And the scientific
rationale behind why this particular medicine is
available?
Neuropathy is very common. It's probably the most common
difficulty with diabetes. The major cause of amputation is
peripheral neuropathy. Highly preventable, highly
treatable.
My own sense is that there are going to be more
people
with diabetes.
We don't yet know enough how to stop that,
although I think we'll know enough within three
to four
years.
But once someone gets diabetes, we know how to stop
them from having problems.
We don't need a lot more science to tell us how
to do
it. What
we need are to find ways to get it done.
And
that's not an easy thing, because it involves
making sure
doctors know and nurses know, and making sure that
people
with diabetes feel they have the right,
opportunity, and
responsibility to demand these things, and those
aren't easy
things to deal with. But I think, today, we can do a lot.
I think tomorrow we're going to know a lot more;
and I would
see, at the end of that rainbow, for people with
diabetes,
not a pot of baked beans, but a pot of
gold. Thanks.
BENEFITS OF THE INSULIN PUMP
Insulin pump therapy, what the doctors call
continuous
subcutaneous infusion, offers a number of
advantages over
traditional (hypodermic injection) insulin
therapy.
Although the insulin pump is complex and
expensive, it does
a better job than the needle, and if you use
insulin, it may
do a better job for you.
Where needle-injecting insulin users generally
mix
different insulin types to achieve optimal
"coverage," pump
users use only short-acting insulin, adjusting
the machine
rather than their insulin mix. This produces results more
resembling those of a healthy (non-diabetic)
pancreas.
Once the new steps necessary to using the pump
have
been mastered, insulin pumpers report greater
ease in
diabetes self-management, less anxiety and
depression, and
significantly fewer problems with hypoglycemic
events,
compared with those on multiple insulin
injection therapy.
One place where the pump offers marked
improvement is
in meal planning. The diabetic who injects insulin several
times a day must schedule meals to match his or
her
insulin's response curve. You thus must eat when the
medication you injected says so. With the pump, that
constraint is minimized. The pumper merely adjusts the
dosage for the desired amount of food, and goes
about it.
Remembering that exercise burns blood glucose, a
diabetic using multiple injection therapy cannot
engage in
nonscheduled exercise (or miss scheduled
exercise), without
diet adjustment. Everything must be scheduled around those
injections.
With the pump, however, you can immediately
take action to adjust the dose, and go have that
off-
schedule meal or exercise. The pump user has far more
freedom to vary his or her activities than does
the syringe
user.
Today's pumps are not perfect robots,
however. They do
not autodetect your blood level and respond--so
you still
have to test regularly, four to six times a
day. You have
to take an active interest in intensive therapy
and
controlling your diabetes, and, as the doctors
say, be
"self-motivated and willing to learn and
accept the
responsibility for insulin pump therapy as well
as the
troubleshooting and self-care..."
Although the pump user has to take an active
hand, that
hand does not have to be sighted! Just as there are
adaptive blood glucose monitors and
insulin-drawing tools,
modern pumps contain audio cues that enable many
blind
individuals to use them successfully.
If you are diabetic, interested in pursuing
insulin-
pump therapy, meet with a diabetes educator who
is
knowledgeable with the pump, and with a
physician who is
enthusiastic and knowledgeable with this form of
treatment.
These health professionals will discuss with you
the
advantages, disadvantages, realistic goals, and
expectations
regarding insulin pump therapy.
Talk to your health care team--and happy
pumping!
TYPE 1 DIABETES PREVENTION TRIAL NEEDS
VOLUNTEERS
Can type 1, insulin-dependent diabetes be
prevented?
If blood tests suggest you are at high risk of
developing
the condition, can anything be done to stop the
process?
Type 1 diabetes, with its absolute insulin
deficiency
and the resulting need for daily insulin
injections, occurs
when the body's own immune system mistakes the
insulin-
producing Beta cells of the pancreas for
"invaders," as if
they were germs, and attacks them. Researchers, who already
know how the body's immune system picks its
targets and
destroys them, wondered if the "ICA"
(islet cell antibody)
attack on the Beta cells could be deterred or
short-
circuited, preventing or delaying the onset of
diabetes.
The National Institutes of Health has launched a
research study to answer that question. Researchers want to
know:
A. Whether daily insulin injections, given to
persons
judged at high risk of developing type 1
diabetes (but
not yet "diabetic"), might slow or
prevent the disease.
B. Whether oral insulin, insulin pills, might
"teach" the
immune system and its ICAs to "accept"
the Beta cells,
halting the destructive process that causes type
1
diabetes.
This "oral tolerization" has already worked
in animal trials.
Major tests of this type cannot be done in some
laboratory.
They cannot be done quickly.
They cannot be
simply modeled on a computer. "The Diabetes Prevention
Trial--Type 1" needs volunteers, people at
high risk of
developing diabetes, to participate, to prove
whether either
of these approaches has merit. If either technique results
in a significant reduction or delay in
full-blown diabetes
(as compared to similar folks not receiving the
insulin), we
will have a potent new tool for diabetes
prevention.
Researchers are still looking for close
relatives of
persons with type 1 diabetes, to participate in
the study.
Eligible participants must: Be between the ages of three
and 45 years, be willing to accept either
"injecting,"
"oral," or "control group"
assignment, have blood test
results that show the person is at high risk of
developing
type 1 diabetes, and must have a close relative
with type 1
diabetes.
The researchers have very specific questions to
answer, and need to interview thousands of
people to get the
right test subjects. If you fit the criteria, and a free
preliminary test finds you have the ICAs, the
islet cell
antibodies, in your blood, you might be one of
them.
Nine different diabetes centers, located in
California,
Colorado, Minnesota, Washington state, Florida,
and
Massachusetts, will gather data. More than 350 "screening
sites" across the country will help
researchers find the
right test subjects. Participants living in other areas can
have tests forwarded by their family
physician. For
information and a list of screening sites, call
the Diabetes
Prevention Trial--Type 1 (DPT-1) National
Coordinating
Center, located in Miami, Florida; telephone:
1-800-425-8361.
TYPE 2 AND HEALTHY LIFESTYLE
by Peter
J. Nebergall, PhD
Strictly speaking, we don't know what causes
diabetes.
We know about 10% will have type 1, with its
sudden,
unambiguous symptoms and immediate need for
injected
insulin; but about 90% of all diabetics have
type 2, with
its slow, creeping onset, and increasing need
for first oral
medications, then insulin. How'd they get it? Where did
they get it from?
We know genetics plays a role in type 2, as it
clearly
runs in families. We know lifestyle plays a role, and we
know there's something about weight. Let's see how they fit
together.
Keep in mind that although we can see the genetic
link, no researcher has yet isolated which gene
is
responsible for type 2 diabetes.
Now things get a bit complex. Geneticists know there
is a difference between carrying a trait (like
having the
gene for type 2 diabetes) and expressing that
trait (having
overt type 2 diabetes). In so many words, having the gene
is not the same thing as having the
disease. People can
have the trait, and not show the overt symptoms
of diabetes.
How?
Type 2 is also known as adult-onset
diabetes. In past
centuries, a good many people didn't live long
enough for
the diabetes they were doubtless carrying to
express, to
give them the diagnosable symptoms of type 2
diabetes. They
died of childhood diseases, accidents, plague,
war, or
filth-borne killers like typhus and cholera
instead. Now we
live longer, and type 2 appears.
In the past, most peoples jobs involved hard
physical
labor.
There was no shortage of exercise, and few but kings
had the opportunity to get fat and be
sedentary. Now, far
too many of us sit down to work, and eat junk
food. Diet
and exercise?
Type 2 appears.
Here's how it all fits together. In the past, if
someone lived long enough for type 2 to appear,
his/her diet
(most people couldn't afford to overeat) and
hard-labor
lifestyle kept the symptoms at bay, either long
enough to
die of something else, or for the eventual
fatality to be
put down to "old age." When I was a child, the official
life expectancy of an American male was 67
years. Medicine
has improved, we live longer, and more cases of
type 2
appear.
We have far better tests now. We can detect the
symptoms of type 2 years before we would have,
and
intervene.
A person with insulin resistance, judged "at
risk" of developing diabetes, can turn to
diet and exercise,
the "healthy lifestyle" espoused
thousands of years ago by
Greek physician Hippocrates of Kos. It won't eliminate the
trait (the genetic predisposition toward type
2), but it
will retard its expression (full-blown
diabetes), and (a
free gift from Hippocrates to us), it can
partially, or even
completely, reverse the symptoms of type 2.
No two cases of diabetes are alike. We don't know all
the factors involved, so prediction cannot be
precise. But
we do know that a person with the gene for type
2 diabetes,
who lives a healthy lifestyle, will probably
express
(develop diagnosable) diabetes later, with less
severity, or
not at all.
We know that someone who has already been
diagnosed with overt type 2 diabetes, who adopts
a healthy
lifestyle, will slow, maybe even stop, the
disease process.
That should be reason enough.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
TAKE
TIME TO SMELL THE ROSES: MARIA JOHNSON
Photo:
portrait. Caption: Maria Johnson
You never know your own strength, until you are
tested.
You may think you have a "breaking
point," a level of
difficulties you can't handle, a morass from
which you can't
escape.
You're probably wrong.
Maria Johnson has diabetes. She believes it started at
around the age of 12, but she was 15 years old
when a nurse
at a birth-control clinic first told her she had
high
sugars.
"I couldn't tell my mother I'd been there," she
says.
"I was pregnant with my first son, at the
age of 17,
and was diagnosed at that time with
insulin-dependent
diabetes," she says. "My sugars were 550-600 mg/dL. I was
overwhelmed with medications, diet, and
exercise...
"Many people in my family have
diabetes," she reports.
"I have a very large family. My grandmother, father, uncles
and aunts from both sides of the family have
diabetes; most
take shots, but some also take pills. But," she adds, "from
my generation, out of cousins ranging from age
15 to 29, I
am the only one who has it. They do not know how hard it is
to live with this disease, nor do they
ask."
Maria has had a lot of recurring problems. Some stem
from her diabetes, some don't, but all have to
be dealt
with, at the same time. She has dealt with neuropathy in
the feet and lower legs, retinopathy
("floaters" in both
eyes, and a vitrectomy in February of 1999),
frequent yeast
infections (not uncommon for diabetic women),
gum disease
(again, not an uncommon complication of
diabetes), postural
hypotension, unexplained pain in various parts
of her body,
weight gain, hair loss, and nuisance
infections. Add to
these difficulties with her upbringing (her
family emigrated
from the Philippines when she was one year
old). But Maria
is not a "quitter."
Maria and husband Terence have two children:
Tyler, age
nine, and Tyson, age one (neither of whom have
diabetes) .
And she is getting control, going about with her
life.
"My health care team now consists of a
family
practitioner, an endocrinologist, an
ophthalmologist, a
neurologist, a podiatrist, a dentist, and a
dermatologist.
I have seen many doctors. I have changed doctors, when one
did not meet my needs. I believe that you and your doctor
should have a good relationship, because this is
your health
and your life.
"My life has always been hard," she
says. "It still
is. I
try my best to stay positive, but at times I just
can't. I
am writing a book, about my diabetes, about the
stresses of my upbringing. Some people will never
understand what I've been through, because
they've never
walked two miles in my shoes. When I tell my stories, it
helps me heal."
Maria is determined to carry on with her
life: "I take
care of myself, at least I try. I take 4 shots a day, and
check my blood sugar five to six times a
day. I've ordered
a MiniMed 508 insulin pump. I use large-print settings on
my computer screen, I still model, part-time,
and I work for
ABC TV as a receptionist/operator."
Maria believes that when you were born, you were
crying, and everyone around you was smiling--so
live your
life so that when you die, you're the one who is
smiling and
everyone else around you is crying. Her words of wisdom:
"I almost fell into a coma, exactly one
year ago. My doctor
said I almost died. Now I take time to smell the roses, and
I try not to sweat the small stuff in my life.
Thank you,
and stay healthy."
TYPE 1
VACCINE?
Swedish pharmaceutical company Diamyd Medical AB
announced in January that its experimental type
1 diabetes
vaccine, Diamyd, has successfully completed a
Phase-I
clinical study, in human subjects. The company plans to
seek permission to conduct a Phase II clinical
study in
about three months.
The Phase I trial, designed solely to address
the
clinical safety of the product, was started in
February
1999.
Twenty-four healthy male Caucasian volunteers were
selected for inclusion in this double-blind
study, which
involved sub-cutaneous injection of one of four
ascending
dose levels up to a maximum of
0.5mg/person. There were no
adverse clinical effects, and all dose levels,
including the
maximum, 0.5mg/person, were well tolerated.
Diamyd(TM) is the proprietary name for
recombinant
human GAD65 (glutamic acid decarboxylase). As previously
reported in the scientific literature, several
studies with
GAD65 using diabetic mice have shown that
administration of
GAD to diabetes prone animals can prevent type 1
diabetes.
Based on the animal studies, and the
successfully completed
Phase 1 clinical, Diamyd Medical is currently
developing
GAD65 as a biopharmaceutical for treatment
and/or prevention
of type 1 diabetes.
In April 2000 Diamyd Medical plans to apply for
regulatory approval to conduct a multi-center
Phase II study
in LADA (Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in the
Adult) patients
in Europe. The Phase II study is intended to
enable
selection of doses and surrogate tolerance
assays for
further clinical development.
The company hopes, if all regulatory hurdles are
successfully passed, to place their vaccine on
the market by
the end of year 2004.
BOOK
REVIEWS
by
Marilyn Helton
Spring Brings New Beginnings
By the time you read this we will have
celebrated Mardi
Gras, St. Patrick's Day, Passover and Easter;
probably
weeded, raked and prepared for the summer
vegetable garden;
and set our clocks forward and generally plunged
full
throttle into Spring!
It had to happen soon or later, and I just wish
I had
thought of doing it! "The Diabetic Four Ingredient
Cookbook," by Linda Coffee and Emily Cale,
has made its
debut.
If you're interested in quick and inexpensive
recipes, this book is your answer. I haven't tried any of
the recipes yet, but they look good. (After you've read as
many cookbooks as I have, you can just about
"eye-ball" a
recipe and almost be able to taste it!) Each recipe has a
complete nutritional analysis with dietary
exchanges.
If you're looking for simple recipes requiring
less
time, less ingredients and less hassle, and will
still meet
your diabetic menu guidelines, give this book
a try.
Over
200 delicious dishes requiring four ingredients
or less.
Published by Coffee and Cale, 1999, ISBN
0-9628550-4-9,
$9.95.
You can order by calling their toll-free number:
1-800-757-0838.
Visa and Mastercard are accepted.
"The All New Diabetic Cookbook," by
Kitty Maynard, RN,
Lucian Maynard, RN, and Theodore Duncan, MD,
offers
traditional recipes from appetizers to desserts,
and new
vegetarian recipes using a variety of rices,
grains and
vegetables.
If you associate the Maynard names with
non-diabetic cookbook titles, you're absolutely
correct.
They have authored "The American Country
Inn Cookbook" and
"The Bed & Breakfast Cookbook,"
both of which I have in my
library.
It was a pleasant surprise to learn that they are
both RNs with extensive experience in the care
and knowledge
of all diabetic conditions.
With bed and breakfast and country inn cookbook
expertise infused into "The All New
Diabetic Cookbook," one
can't go wrong.
It caters to anyone who loves to cook,
loves the kitchen and wishes to be aware of the
nutritional
value of the foods they prepare. More than 400 deliciously
tempting recipes are included and, while the
recipes are
designed to meet the needs of diabetics, they will
satisfy
everyone.
I usually read a new cookbook from desserts back
to appetizers (you can tell what I like to eat!)
and this
book certainly has a wealth of great food
ideas. There is a
special recipe section for children called
"Kids' Meals," an
area frequently overlooked in general diabetic
cookbooks.
Recipes for healthy pizzas, burgers and fries,
tacos, and
desserts will tempt adult appetites, as well.
Information on how diet affects diabetes,
designing an
individualized meal plan, how to count
carbohydrates, types
of sugars, and practical tips for living with
diabetes are
presented by the third author, Theodore Duncan,
MD. Dr.
Duncan is president of the Diabetes Education
and Research
Center, assistant professor of Clinical Medicine
at the
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,
and former
chief, Department of Diabetes Mellitus and
Metabolism at
Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia. You can access the
Diabetes Education and Research Center website
at
www.libertynet.org/~diabetes
"The All New Diabetic Cookbook" is
published by
Rutledge Hill Press, 1999, $19.95, ISBN
1-55853-675-2
(paperback).
I like this cookbook and I think you will,
too!
Speaking of desserts, one of my favorite low-fat
cookbook authors, Sue Spitler, has teamed up with
Linda R.
Yoakam, RD, MS, to publish "1,001 Low-Fat
Desserts." I am a
great fan of Sue Spitler's books and have
several of her
other titles, including "1,001 Low-Fat
Recipes, Skinny
Pastas, Skinny Cookies, Cakes &
Sweets," and her recent
"Skinny Comfort Foods."
With over a thousand dessert recipes in
"1,001 Low-Fat
Desserts," you can satisfy your sweet tooth
without
sabotaging your waistline. Deep-dish pies, tangy tarts,
cookies by the dozen, sugary cobblers, crunchy
crisps,
fluffy cheesecakes, custards, souffles, fruit
and frozen
desserts, cream puffs, pastries and dessert
sauces are
layered between 650 pages of palate-pleasing bliss. There's
even a chapter of quick-and-easy desserts made
with
artificial sweeteners instead of sugar.
Complete nutritional information and diabetic
exchanges
are included for each recipe. For a dessert lover like me,
I figure the cost of this dream book amounts to
about two
cents per recipe--a terrific bargain! Published by Surrey
Books, Inc., 1999, $19.95, ISBN 1-57284-028-5
(paperback).
If you're looking for home cooking just like
Mom's,
you'll find more than 250 fast, low-fat recipes
with
old-fashioned good taste in "The Complete
Quick & Hearty
Diabetic Cookbook." From breakfast to dinner, appetizers to
desserts, it's all here. Uncomplicated recipes with
easy-to-find ingredients are accompanied by
titillating
culinary comment. Some recipes also have "serve-with"
suggestions.
I like the fact that the serving size is also
included.
Each recipe has dietary exchanges as well as
nutritional analysis. Dietary fiber and sugar content are
also included.
Published by the American Diabetes
Association, 1998, 272 pages (soft cover),
$12.95 (ADA
member price $10.95. You can order toll-free,
1-800-232-6733; ask for #4624-01).
If you'd like to read more reviews, visit the
Cinnamon
Hearts website at http://www.cinnamonhearts.com
and click on
"Cook's Library." Until we meet again this summer, stay
healthy and positive!
NOTE:
Marilyn Helton is the editor of "Cinnamon
Hearts~The Art of Living A Winning Diabetic
Lifestyle," a
positive-power newsletter for diabetics and
their families.
Subscriptions to "Cinnamon Hearts"
newsletter are available
for $19.80/year (USA); $20 (Canada); from Cinnamon Hearts
DLE, PO Box 578340, Modesto, CA 95357-8340.
RECIPE
CORNER
Artwork:
Fruits and vegetables
Send your great food ideas to the editor. Your recipes
will be evaluated by dietitians, and if
necessary, adjusted
to make them more diabetically appropriate. Then he gets to
taste them...
This issue, all recipes were provided by the
California
Avocado Commission (website: http://www.avocado.org), and
all feature the avocado, a healthful fruit that
is very low
in things like fat and cholesterol. Give them a try!
California Avocado and Wheatberry Salad
by Marilou Cerny, MS, RD
Wheat berries are the whole, unrefined grain of
wheat.
They retain all their original goodness,
including B
vitamins, antioxidants, and fiber. Total calories are a
bargain for the healthy advantages this
versatile dish
provides.
Ingredients:
2 cups wheat berries
4 cups water
1 teaspoon dried thyme
1 teaspoon dried basil
1 teaspoon salt
2 sun-dried tomatoes
1 avocado, peeled and pit removed, diced
juice of 1 lemon
1 small red pepper, finely diced
1/2 cup red onion, finely chopped
1 basket (1 pint) cherry tomatoes, quartered
Up to 1/4 cup fresh chopped herbs: parsley,
basil, chives
1 tablespoon extra virgin olive oil
1 teaspoon balsamic vinegar
1 teaspoon salt
Instructions:
Wash the dried wheat berries and soak them
overnight in
the water.
When ready to cook, add the dried herbs, 1
teaspoon salt, and the sun-dried tomatoes. Water should
cover the grains with about 1/2" on
top. Bring to the boil,
then reduce heat to very low and simmer,
covered, 45 minutes
or until tender. Set aside to cool.
Drain off any extra liquid (save to use in soup
stock).
Put cooked wheat berries in a bowl. Chop the sun-dried
tomato finely and add back to the wheat
berries. Add the
olive oil, vinegar, crushed garlic, and
salt. Mix
thoroughly.
(Up to this point, the salad can be prepared
ahead and held in the refrigerator for 1-2
days). Add the
red pepper, onion, and tomato. Toss and add the fresh
herbs.
Toss the avocado dice in the lemon juice. Add to the salad
and mix in gently.
Makes 8 servings. Per serving: 200
calories; 7g
protein; 40g carbohydrate; 2.5g fat (0.5g
saturated fat,
1.5g mono-unsaturated fat, 0.5 polyunsaturated
fat); 0mg
cholesterol; 7g fiber; 590mg sodium.
California Guacamole--Diabetic Diet
by the California Avocado Commission
Ingredients:
2 medium California avocados
3 tbsp. fresh lemon juice
1/2 cup onion, diced
3 tbsp tomato, chopped
1/2 tsp. salt
2 tbsp. cilantro, minced
Instructions:
Cut the avocados in half and remove the
seeds. Scoop
out the pulp and place in a bowl. Drizzle the pulp with
lemon juice and mash. Combine with the remaining
ingredients, mix well and serve.
Serve with 1 cup raw vegetables for 1 vegetable
exchange.
Use to prepare California Tuna Sandwich. Use as
a spread on bread or rolls in place of margarine
or
mayonnaise.
Makes 12 servings: Per serving: 55 calories, 5g fat,
0.8g saturated fat, 0.6g polyunsaturated fat,
3.2g mono-
unsaturated fat, 0mg cholesterol, 93mg sodium,
3g total
carbohydrate, 1g dietary fiber, 1g sugars, 1g
protein.
Exchanges: 1 fat.
California Tuna Sandwiches--Diabetic Diet
by the California Avocado Commission
Ingredients:
3/4 cup California Guacamole
1 can (6 oz.) water-packed tuna, drained
1 1/2 cup celery, diced
1 1/2 cup onion, diced
6 pitas pita pocket bread
6 leaves Romaine lettuce
1/4 radishes, sliced
Instructions:
Prepare California Guacamole according to
recipe. In a
bowl, combine Guacamole, tuna, celery, and onion
and mix
well.
Lightly toast pita pockets and cut in half. Fill
each half with the tuna mixture and 1/2 lettuce
leaf.
Garnish with radish slices.
This makes a good lunch meal with a piece of
fresh
fruit and a glass of low-fat or non-fat
milk. To increase
the protein, add another can of tuna to the
recipe for an
additional lean meat exchange (55 calories) per
serving.
Makes two servings. Per serving: 257
calories, 4g
fat, 0.7g saturated fat, 0.8g polyunsaturated
fat, 2.2 mono-
unsaturated fat, 5mg cholesterol, 424mg sodium,
40g total
carbohydrate, 3g dietary fiber, 4g sugars, 14g
protein.
Exchanges:
2 bread, 1 lean meat, 1 vegetable, 1 fat.
California Avocado Veggie Tacos--Diabetic Diet
by the California Avocado Commission
Ingredients:
1 med. California avocado
as needed, non-stick cooking spray
1 1/4 cup onion, julienne strips
1 1/2 cup sweet green pepper, julienne strips
1 1/2 cup sweet red pepper, julienne strips
1 cup cilantro
1 1/2 cup Fresh Tomato Salsa (recipe below)
12 flour tortillas, 8-inch
Instructions:
Prepare Fresh Tomato Salsa in advance (see
below).
Spray skillet with non-stick cooking spray. Lightly saute'
the onion and green and red peppers. Mince
cilantro and cut
avocado into 12 slices. Warm tortillas in oven and fill
with sauteed peppers and onions, cilantro,
avocado slices,
and salsa.
Fold tortilla over and serve.
Makes a quick snack for children after school,
or easy
lunch. The fresh salsa can be made ahead and
keeps for two
days under refrigeration.
Fresh Tomato Salsa:
Ingredients:
1 cup fresh tomatoes, diced
3 cup onions, diced
1/2 clove garlic, minced
1/3 tsp. jalapeno peppers, minced
2 tsp. cilantro, minced
1 pinch cumin
1 1/2 tsp. fresh lime juice
Instructions:
Salsa Preparation: Mix together all ingredients and
refrigerate.
Yields: 1 1/2 cups of salsa.
Makes 12 servings. Per serving: 158
calories, 5g fat,
0.8g saturated fat, 1.3g polyunsaturated fat, 2.7g mono-
unsaturated fat, 0mg cholesterol, 175mg sodium,
25g total
carbohydrate, 2g dietary fiber, 3g sugars, 4g
protein.
Exchanges per serving: 1 bread, 1 vegetable, 1 fat.
ASK THE DOCTOR
by Wesley W. Wilson, MD
NOTE: If
you have any questions for "Ask the Doctor,"
please send them to the VOICE editorial
office. The only
questions Dr. Wilson will be able to answer are
the ones
used in this column.
Wesley W. Wilson, MD has retired as an Internal
Medicine practitioner at the Western Montana
Clinic in
Missoula, Montana. Dr. Wilson was diagnosed with type 1
diabetes in 1956, during his second year of
medical school.
He remains interested and involved in diabetes
education for
patients and professionals.
Q: My
doctor and I are arguing about my A1c numbers.
He says an ideal A1c is below 7, but my sugar
fluctuates.
I'm worried about hypos if I fight to keep it
that low. If
I keep it CLOSE to 7, and give myself a little
safety room
against "lows," isn't that better?
A: I'm
pleased you and your doctor are discussing
your hemoglobin A1c values. Medical advice must be a two-
way street, with each willing to listen to the
other.
Ideally, the A1c should be in the normal
range--below 6.2%,
but in real life, the concerns you mention
prevent such
tight control for many individuals.
I find it interesting to review the research
studies
that have attempted to demonstrate the benefits
of tight
control versus "conventional"
control. In all studies,
particularly in the Diabetes Control and
Complications Trial
(DCCT), even with very careful supervision of
the tight
control group, the average A1c was very close to
7%. The
target was under 6.2% at the start of the study,
but the
increased risk of hypoglycemia posed by such low
numbers
required a bit less intensive blood sugar
control. The
treatment team and the patients decided that the
risk of low
blood sugars required a reduction in insulin
dose. Similar
results were found in the recently-reported
United Kingdom
Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), for persons with
type 2
diabetes.
The Kumamoto study, in which type 2 persons were
treated with insulin, showed the same
result. All studies
were able to achieve a hemoglobin A1c of about
7%. Today,
treatment of diabetes with insulin, or with any
of the other
agents used to control blood sugar, is just not
precise
enough to allow "perfect" blood sugar
control, but we should
attempt to achieve the best possible A1c.
Most individuals in the DCCT could not achieve a
"normal," (non-diabetic) A1c (below
6.2%), but 5% of the
intensively-treated type 1 persons were able to
maintain a
normal A1c for the 9 1/2 years of the
study. We wish we
could bottle what it was they had to allow such
tight
control!
Many persons balance high sugars with too low
sugars to achieve their low A1c's, but
hypoglycemia is
dangerous and risky. Most diabetes professionals know of
patients who have been involved in auto
accidents while
"low."
The current ADA recommendations are a
compromise--the
target A1c is described as "7% or
lower," and if the test
results are 8% or higher, "a change in
treatment is
suggested." It is recognized that each person is different,
and each achievable A1c is different, and there
is agreement
that an 8% HbA1c is too high.
Your situation may be unique: Do you have hypoglycemia
unawareness?
If you can't "feel" the onset of hypoglycemia,
your first sign of low blood sugar may be
passing out or
falling down.
Do you always check your sugar before
beginning a hazardous activity (like
driving)? It is really
dangerous to drive while low. How careful are you with the
routine things required to maintain ideal blood
sugar, such
as counting carbs and giving just the right
amount of
insulin with each meal? A visit to your dietitian or nurse
educator may be helpful.
The bottom line is that insulin and some other
lifesaving drugs are very powerful, and
therefore very
dangerous.
We need better ways of treating diabetes. We
need to support research into better techniques
for
treatment of diabetes. We know that the closer to normal
your A1c, the less the risk of microvascular
complications
(neuropathy, retinopathy, nephropathy,...) It's hard to be
perfect, but even though we cannot achieve
"normal"
hemoglobin A1c values in most persons with
diabetes, getting
that value down to 7% clearly reduces the risk
of
microvascular disease.
DIALYSIS AT NATIONAL CONVENTION
by Ed Bryant
Photo: portrait. Caption:
Ed Bryant
During this year's annual convention of the
National
Federation of the Blind in Atlanta, Georgia (Sunday,
July 2,
through Saturday, July 8), dialysis will be
available.
Individuals requiring dialysis must have a
transient patient
packet and physician's statement filled out
prior to
treatment.
Conventioneers must have their unit contact the
desired location in the Atlanta area for
instructions, well
in advance.
NOTE: The convention will take
place at the
Atlanta Marriott Marquis, 265 Peachtree Center,
in downtown
Atlanta.
Individuals will be responsible for, and must
pay out
of pocket, prior to each treatment, the
approximately $30
not covered by Medicare, plus any additional
physician's
fees, and any charges for other medications.
DIALYSIS CENTERS SHOULD SET UP TRANSIENT
DIALYSIS
LOCATIONS AT LEAST TWO MONTHS IN ADVANCE. THIS HELPS ASSURE
A LOCATION FOR ANYONE WANTING TO DIALYZE. There are many
centers in the Atlanta area, but that area is
quite large,
so early reservation is strongly recommended, to
avoid long
taxi rides!
Here are some dialysis locations:
* Dialysis
Clinic, Inc. -- West Peachtree, 820
West
Peachtree Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30308; telephone:
(404) 888-4520.
* Gambro Healthcare , 699 Ponce De Leon Ave., Suite 19,
Atlanta, GA 30308; telephone: (404) 872-7211.
* Gambro Healthcare Atlanta, 400 Decatur Street,
Atlanta, GA 30312; telephone: (404) 577-9097.
* Gambro Healthcare , 524 West Peachtree Street,
Atlanta, GA 30308; telephone: (404) 249-1563.
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SCHEDULE DIALYSIS TREATMENTS
EARLY,
TO ENSURE SPACE. If scheduling assistance is needed, have
your dialysis unit's social worker contact
me: Diabetes
Action Network President Ed Bryant;
telephone: (573)
875-8911.
See you in Atlanta!
2000
NATIONAL CONVENTION
It will soon be time for the 2000 convention of
the
National Federation of the Blind, to be held
again at the
Atlanta Marriott Marquis, 265 Peachtree Center
Avenue,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303. The Marquis is a beautiful hotel,
in a convenient, central location.
Although Marriott has a national reservation
number:
1-800-228-9290, do not use it. To receive our special
rates, all hotel reservations must be made with
the Marriott
Marquis directly. Please telephone them at:
(404) 521-
0000, or write them at the address above. Be sure you tell
them you will be attending the annual convention
of the
National Federation of the Blind. REMEMBER: No reservation
will be valid unless it has been made directly
with the
Marriott Marquis Hotel in Atlanta. To confirm a telephone
reservation, you will need a credit card number,
and the
reservation charge is $60, applied toward your
stay.
Here are our hotel rates for 2000: one in a room, $57
per night; two in a room, $59; three in a room,
$61; four in
a room, $63.
Local taxes (about 14 percent) will apply.
Here are the convention dates and schedule:
Sunday, July 2 -- Seminars
Monday, July 3 -- Convention registration
Tuesday, July 4 -- National Board Meeting (open
to all)
Wednesday, July 5 -- General Sessions
Thursday, July 6 -- Tour Day
Friday, July 7 -- Banquet
Saturday, July 8 -- General Sessions,
adjournment.
Our Diabetes Action Network Seminar
At the 2000 convention of the National
Federation of
the Blind, in Atlanta, Georgia, our Diabetes
Action Network
will have its seminar and business meeting, on
Monday, July
3, from 6 to 9 pm. There will be a presentation about a new
talking device that will provide information on
any
prescription medication (including insulin).
Our keynote speaker will be dietitian and
diabetes
educator Brooks Kent, RD, CDE, who will discuss
all phases
of the healthy "diabetic diet" (healthy for non-diabetics,
too!).
We will also hear from blind diabetic Bernadette
Jacobs, who will share views of life, diabetes,
and a
humorous bus ride. There will be an open panel discussion,
on "Diabetics in the Workplace."
Once again, we will have our "Make the
President Pay"
diabetes quiz game--and President Ed Bryant says
he will
give a nice donation to the Division for each
right answer!
Our seminar is free and open to the public. Its location
will be posted in the agenda (provided when you
register).
If you or a friend would like to remember the
Diabetes
Action Network of the National Federation of the
Blind in
your will, you can do so by employing the
following
language:
"I give, devise, and bequeath unto the
Diabetics Action
Network of the National Federation of the Blind,
1800
Johnson Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21230, a
District of
Columbia nonprofit corporation, the sum of
$_______________"
(or "_______________ percent of my net
estate" or "the
following stocks and
bonds:____________________") to be used
for its worthy purposes on behalf of blind
persons."
COOKING WITH SUZI
by Suzi Castle
Got a craving?
Go ahead! Chocolate can
stimulate your
brain's production of serotonin, which soothes
an edgy mood.
A craving for chocolate may be our body's way of
telling us
that we need more of this mood-enhancing
nutrient. The good
news is that experts say you can indulge in your
favorite
treats by choosing a small portion of a
low-calorie version.
This rich-tasting, yet low-fat, sugar-free
chocolate truffle
will satisfy your chocolate cravings without
guilt!
Chocolate Truffles
Ingredients:
1
package (2 teaspoons) plain gelatin
1/3 cup
water
1
tablespoon vanilla
3 tablespoons
cocoa, divided
1/4 cup
water
1 cup
(2% fat) milk powder (equal to 4 cups low-fat milk)
Sugar substitute equal to 1/3 cup sugar (i.e., 8
packets Equal)
2
tablespoons dried currants
6
tablespoons finely chopped walnuts, divided
Instructions:
Mix gelatin with 1/3 cup water in a heat-proof
measuring cup.
Let soften for 2 minutes, then dissolve by
heating in a microwave oven for 20 seconds. In a blender,
mix dissolved gelatin, vanilla, 1 tablespoon
cocoa, 1/4 cup
water, milk powder and sugar substitute. Pour into a small
bowl and stir in currants and 1 tablespoon
chopped walnuts.
Refrigerate until mixture thickens and is firm
enough to
shape.
Meanwhile, mix remaining 2 tablespoons cocoa with
remaining 5 tablespoons walnuts. Using two teaspoons, shape
gelatin mixture into 20 small balls. Roll each ball into
the cocoa-walnut mixture. Refrigerate until firm. Makes 20
truffles.
Per truffle:
40 cal. (2% from fat); 2.64gm protein;
1.64gm fat (0.36gm saturated fat); 3.85gm
carbohydrates;
31mg sodium; 1.7mg cholesterol.; 0.12gm
fiber. Exchanges: 1
nonfat milk.
"Suzi Castle's Deliciously Healthy Favorite
Foods
Cookbook" is available now in most
bookstores or by sending
$18.90 ($14.95 + $3.95 S&H) to Health
Cookbooks Dept. M,
3520 McCourry Street, Bakersfield, CA 93304.
FOOD FOR
THOUGHT
Artwork:
Dancing fruits and vegetables
We invite blurbs and tidbit articles for
inclusion in
this column.
Materials received may be edited and used as
space permits.
Products and services included in this
column are for information only and do not imply
endorsement
by the Diabetes Action Network of the NFB.
BEEF-SOURCE INSULIN
Both U.S. insulin manufacturers, Eli Lilly and
Company,
and Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Inc, have
ceased production
of beef-source insulins, and are winding down
their
production of pork-based insulins as well. To help supply
those diabetics who desire an animal-source
insulin, CP
Pharmaceuticals, a British-based drug
manufacturer, has
announced it will increase its production of its
Hypurin
beef-source insulin.
CP Pharmaceuticals has also announced it is
filing for
approval to market its insulin products in the
United States
and Canada.
Until such regulatory approval is granted,
diabetics in the U.S. who wish to use this
product must go
through formal personal import procedures.
CP Pharmaceuticals has established a special
toll-free
number for consumers in the U.S. and
Canada: 011-800-667-
55555.
Write to them: CP Pharmaceuticals
Limited, Ash Road
North, Wrexham Industrial Estate, Wrexham, LL13
9UF, United
Kingdom.
BOARD MEMBERS
The Diabetes Action Network of the National
Federation of
the Blind.
President:
Ed Bryant
Columbia, MO
First Vice President: Eric Woods
Denver, CO
Second Vice President: Sandie Addy
Prescott Valley, AZ
Treasurer:
Bruce Peters
Akron, OH
Secretary:
Sally York
Castro Valley, CA
Board Member-At-Large: Gisela Distel
Albany, NY
Board Member-At-Large: Paul Price
Valley Center, CA
INSULIN INFORMATION
In Februrary of this year, Novo Nordisk
Pharmaceuticals
announced it was discontinuing its complete line
of purified
pork insulins.
Novo reminds us this process, of switching
from animal-derived to human insulin, has been
underway for
some time, and that its last supplies of Lente
Purified Pork
insulin expired in February. They state they will maintain
product availability of Regular and NPH Purified
Pork
insulins through July 2000--but no further--so
they
encourage all doctors to "review your
medical records as
soon as possible to identify patients who
currently use the
insulin products listed above, and begin
appropriate
transfer to an alternate insulin therapy."
If you are using Novo Nordisk animal source
insulins,
you need to do just that--talk to your doctor
about transfer
to an alternate insulin therapy.
ELECTIONS COMING UP
At this year's national convention in Atlanta,
Georgia,
elections will be held to fill our Diabetes
Action Network
divisional board positions. These are one-year terms,
running from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001. Positions to be
filled are:
President, First Vice-President, Second
Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, and two Board
Members-at-Large. If you are interested in a board
position, or know someone who you think would do
a good job,
then contact our Diabetes Action Network
President, Ed
Bryant. Yes, hard work and dedication are
prerequisites for
board positions--but one must lead by good
example.
EQUAL(r) FOR YOUR DIABETES
As a proud sponsor of the American Diabetes
Association
for 16 years, Equal has worked closely with the
diabetes
community, sponsoring special programs and
events. What's
more, experts agree that aspartame--the
sweetening
ingredient in Equal--doesn't affect glucose or
insulin
levels.
No wonder it's recognized as acceptable as a
diabetes meal plan by the ADA! For further information,
visit the Equal website at http://www.equal.com
or call 1-
800-323-5316.
PROTECTIVE SHOES FOR DIABETICS
We have been asked to announce: Medicare Part B will
pay for one pair of protective shoes for
diabetics (All
diabetics, one pair per year), along with three
pairs of
special shock-absorbing insoles (materials such
as
plastizote).
Medicare also pays for custom inserts (after
partial amputation) to ensure better shoe fit.
To find out more, contact: CHOICE Healthcare, PO Box
99, Charleston, AR 72933; telephone: 1-888-442-3390.
ABOUT PROPULSID AND AVANDIA
ISMP Medication Safety Alert reports two
findings of
interest to diabetics. In the first, Avandia
(rosiglitazone), prescribed for type 2 diabetes,
has been
implicated in the same sort of liver damage as
its
competitor Rezulin. The paper notes that once the drug was
discontinued, the man's liver returned to
health, and the
authors recommend closely monitoring a patient's
liver
enzymes, throughout therapy, and discontinuing
the drug if
difficulties are noted (these instructions are
identical to
those for Rezulin).
In the second note, the newsletter relays a
warning
from FDA Medwatch, a "watchdog" agency
of the U.S.
Government, about Propulsid (cisapride) a
medication often
prescribed for autonomic
neuropathy/gastroparesis. The
study warns that Propulsid is contraindicated in
patients
with serum electrolyte disorders, so patients
treated with
diuretics need to be closely followed.
The Institute for Safe Medication Practices
(ISMP);
telephone: 215-947-7797; website: http://www.ismp.org
JEWISH MATERIALS
We have been asked to announce: The Jewish Heritage
for the Blind is pleased to announce the
availability of
many sacred texts in large print. For ordering information,
please call, fax, or write to: The Jewish Heritage for the
Blind, Department of Large Print Publications,
1655 East
24th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11229; telephone: (718) 601-9128;
fax:
(718) 338-0653.
ARTICLES NEEDED
If you have diabetes, are a family member or
friend of
a diabetic, or a health professional with an
interest in
diabetes, we invite you to submit an article for
publication
in the VOICE OF THE DIABETIC.
Our philosophy regarding diabetes is
positive. Do you
have an inspiring, enlightening story? We, the Diabetes
Action Network of the National Federation of the
Blind, seek
to show people they are not alone, and do have
options,
regardless of diabetic complications. If you have
experienced ramifications, others, who may be
facing the
same side-effects, could benefit from what you
have to say.
Perhaps you have not experienced
complications--your
unique insight, coping strategies, and lifestyle
can still
inspire others.
Are you a relative, a friend, or a health
professional?
More than 280,382 VOICE readers could benefit
from your story.
For information and article submission
guidelines,
contact:
VOICE OF THE DIABETIC, 811 Cherry Street, Suite
309, Columbia, MO 65201; telephone: (573)
875-8911.
HEAR YE, HEAR YE, A RAFFLE
The Diabetes Action Network of the National
Federation
of the Blind reaches out and provides support
and
information to thousands of people. Because it costs to
operate this valuable network and to produce the
VOICE OF
THE DIABETIC, we must generate funds to help
cover these
expenses.
Our Diabetes Action Network has elected to hold a
raffle, which will be coordinated by our division
treasurer,
Bruce Peters.
THE GRAND PRIZE WILL BE $500! The winning ticket will
be drawn, and the winner's name announced, on
July 7, 2000,
at the banquet held during the annual convention
of the
National Federation of the Blind.
Raffle tickets cost $1 each, or a book of six
may be
purchased for $5. Tickets may be purchased from state
representatives of our Diabetes Action Network
or by
contacting the VOICE Editorial Office, 811
Cherry Street,
Suite 309, Columbia, MO 65201; telephone: (573) 875-8911.
Anyone interested in selling tickets should also
contact the
VOICE Editorial Office. Tickets are available now! Names
of persons who sell 50 tickets or more will be
announced in
the VOICE.
Please make checks payable to the National Federation
of the Blind.
Money and sold raffle ticket stubs must be
received at the VOICE office no later than June
10, 2000, or
they can be personally delivered to Raffle
Chairman Bruce
Peters, at this year's NFB convention in
Atlanta, Georgia.
This raffle is open to anyone age 18 or older,
and the
holder of the lucky raffle ticket need not be
present to
win.
Each ticket sold is a donation, helping keep our
Diabetes Action Network moving forward.
WHAT YOU ALWAYS WANTED TO KNOW BUT DIDN'T KNOW
WHERE TO ASK
(Resource Column)
Artwork:
Hand pulling a book from a shelf of books
Inclusion of materials in this publication is
for
information only, and does not imply endorsement
by the
Diabetes Action Network of the NFB.
NEW STUDY NEEDS VOLUNTEERS
Diabetic retinopathy is a frequent complication
of
diabetes.
In some cases, ruptured capillaries leak blood
into the eye, a "vitreous hemorrhage,"
which can cloud the
eye, obscure vision, and cause blindness.
Diabetes is only one of many reasons vitreous
hemorrhage can occur. Those conditions have each their own
treatment--but the problem they share is getting
the opaque
blood out of the eye. Traditionally, you can wait for it to
clear by itself (up to 18 months in some
cases!), or you can
undergo a vitrectomy, a surgical procedure where
the blood
is removed.
Advanced Corneal Systems (ACS), of Irvine,
California,
is engaged in testing a third alternative. ACS has
developed an investigational medication, called
Vitrase,
which offers a quick, non-surgical alternative
to vitrectomy
surgery.
They need volunteers to help them complete their
tests of Vitrase. If you are 18 years or older, and have
experienced retinal bleeding, please contact
Clinicor to
discuss participation. Telephone:
1-800-208-7023.
SAVE YOUR SKIN
Lantiseptic is a line of skin care products of
interest
to diabetics.
The line includes a cream and a skin
protectant, both appropriate for the dry skin
diabetics can
face.
The cream is especially appropriate for dry feet, and
has been clinically tested as appropriate for
diabetic foot
care.
Both products come in tube or jar, and FREE
SAMPLES ARE
AVAILABLE.
For information, or to obtain a free sample,
contact:
Summit Industries, Inc., PO Box 7329, Marietta, GA
30065; telephone: 1-800-241-6996. For a
free sample,
telephone:
1-800-347-2456.
DIABETES SUPPLIES
American Diabetic Supply, Inc., will ship your
diabetes
supplies to your door. They handle all insurance claims and
provide free delivery. Folks with Medicare and/or private
insurance (no HMOs) may receive supplies at no
further cost.
For information, contact: American Diabetic Supply, Inc.,
400 S. Atlantic Ave., Suite 108, Ormond Beach,
FL 32176;
telephone:
1-800-453-9033.
READING MACHINE
There are many ways to cope with the problems
loss of
vision brings to reading. One is to use an optical reading
machine like the Kurzweil 1000. With such a machine, you
scan a printed page into computer memory, from
where it is
then read by a synthesized voice. Large-print text is not
necessary; you can read most any text.
Reading machines vary in accuracy, size of
vocabulary,
and quality of synthesized voice. Kurzweil has been a
leading name in sound synthesis for over 20
years, and the
L&H Kurzweil 1000, their newest product, is
a superb
instrument.
To find out more about this reading machine,
contact:
Lernout and Hauspie Speech Products USA, Inc.,
Kurzweil Educational Systems Group, 52 Third
Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; telephone: 1-800-894-5374; e-mail:
education.sales@lhsl.com; website:
http://www.lhsl.com/kurzweil1000
ADAPTIVE EQUIPMENT CONVENTION
The Assistive Technology Industry Association,
an
organization of adaptive equipment
manufacturers,
distributors and related service personnel, is
having a
conference and exposition, in Orlando, Florida,
January 24
through 27, 2001. In their words: "The
purpose of this
conference will be to provide a forum for
education and
communication to professional practitioners
serving those
with disabilities (teachers, occupational
therapists,
rehabilitation counselors, physicians,
psychologists,
speech-language pathologists, etc.), with the
overarching
goal of providing enhanced benefits and
opportunities to
people with disabilities."
The organizers expect more than 100
presentations, more
than 100 exhibitors, and many networking
opportunities. For
more information, contact: ATIA; telephone: 1-877-687-
2842; e-mail:
atia@northshore.net; website:
http\\www.atia.org
Insta-Glucose
If you have type 1 diabetes, you know low blood
glucose
can be a sneaky enemy. Diabetes medications are powerful
but imprecise; and, if you misdose, if you miss
a meal, if
you are ill, or if you have unexpected,
unscheduled
exercise, you can find yourself going down. You need sugar,
fast!
You need to be carrying it with you, before trouble
hits.
Many people carry sugar candy, or diabetic
glucose
tablets; but one practical alternative is
Insta-Glucose, by
ICN Pharmaceuticals. Insta-Glucose is stronger (one tube,
one treatment, equals 24 grams of glucose), and
it works
faster than glucose tablets. It is easy to use, and very
easy to carry.
Be prepared! It is available at
many
pharmacies and discount chains. For information, contact:
ICN Pharmaceuticals, ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland
Ave., Costa
Mesa, CA 92626; telephone: 1-800-711-9486; website:
http://www.instaglucose.com
DIABETES SUPPLIES
When you need it, you need it. When it's time to test,
when it's time for medication, you need it
already there.
Diabetic Care Center will ship your diabetes
supplies to
your door, and they do the paperwork. No forms, no trips to
the pharmacy.
Medicare and most private insurance accepted.
Call the Diabetic Care Center, telephone: 1-800-633-7167;
website:
http://www.diabeticare.com
TALKING COMPUTERS
Henter-Joyce, Inc., maker of the
"JAWS" series of
computer screen readers, offers screen-to-speech
software
such as JAWS For WINDOWS (JFW), the new MAGic
6.1 screen
magnifier, and tutorials on cassette for programs
like
Internet Explorer and Microsoft Word 8. They also offer
Windows 95, 98, and NT compatibility, and as of
August
31,1999, there have been significant price
cuts. Find out
more at their website: http://www.hj.com, or contact them
for information: Henter-Joyce, Inc., 11800 31st Court
North, St. Petersburg, FL 33716; telephone: 1-800-336-5658;
fax:
(813) 803-8001; e-mail:
info@hj.com
NUTRITION SUPPLEMENT
Your insulin or oral diabetes medications are
only part
of your diabetes self-management. Although food supplements
do not replace your medications, and the U.S.
Food and Drug
Administration has not evaluated their efficacy
to prevent
or treat any disease, a healthy diet is
important, and
research is continuing on the role specific
supplements may
play in controlling diabetes. AlphaBetic Multi-Vitamin
Supplement is a food supplement formulated for
the special
needs of diabetics. A blend of vitamins, antioxidants, and
minerals, is available in sugar-free
caplets. Contact:
Abkit, Inc. New York, NY 10128; telephone: 1-800-226-6227;
website:
http://www.alphabetic.com
DIABETES SUPPLIES
Can-Am Corporation carries a full line of
discount-
priced diabetes supplies, including: test strips, Dex-4
glucose tablets, skin cream, etc. The company also markets
the Monoject line of insulin syringes and
lancets. Many
Can-Am products are also sold as "house
brand" at major
pharmacy chains. Their low price in no way compromises
their high quality.
For information, contact: Can-Am Care Corporation,
Cimetra Industrial Park, Box 98, Chazy, NY
12921-0098;
telephone:
1-800-461-7448.
NEW TALKING BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITOR
Based on the proven Accu-Chek Advantage meter,
the
Roche Diagnostics Accu-Chek Voicemate provides
the
following:
Clear, high-quality speech synthesis, talking
the user through preparations, test procedures,
and results,
without the need for sighted assistance; an
"insulin vial
identifier" which reads Eli Lilly insulin
vials and speaks
their type, as a safety aid in tactile insulin
mixing; a
new, improved, "touchable" test
strip--the Accu-Chek Comfort
Curve (no more "hanging drop of blood"
needed!); no meter
cleaning required; and a tactile
"code-key" system for
programming test strip codes. The Voicemate is the most
"blind-friendly" talking glucose
monitor available today,
and the only one whose regular operations
require no sighted
assistance at all.
The Voicemate comes with an adjustable over-the-
shoulder carrying case, with meter, voice box,
battery,
adapter cord, 10 Comfort Curve strips, earphone,
insulin
check-vial, manual and quick-reference guide (in
print), and
instructions on audiocassette. The new meter (catalog #
2030802) can now be ordered through any pharmacy
(suggested
retail price $495-525). To do so, have your pharmacist
contact Roche Diagnostics, 9115 Hague Road,
Indianapolis, IN
46250; telephone: 1-800-428-5074. For
direct purchase, and
a price below $500, contact any of the following
retailers:
BeyondSight, Inc., Littleton, CO: 303-795-6455
($498);
Independent Living Aids, Inc., Plainview, NY
($495): 1-800-
537-2118; or the National Federation of the
Blind Materials
Center, Baltimore, MD ($475): 410-659-9314.
LIFE INSURANCE FOR DIABETICS
If you have diabetes, you know it can be very
difficult
to find life insurance. Empire Financial, based near
Baltimore, Maryland, specializes in insuring
people with
"high-risk" conditions, especially
diabetes and its
complications.
"We are specialists in high risk," says
Gardner Redd, their CEO. "For 18 years we have covered all
ages, 0 to 90, and all impairments, even people
who have
transplants."
Contact Empire Financial Insurance, 600
Reierstown
Road, Pikesville, MD 21208; telephone: 1-877-263-8603.
TREAT MALE IMPOTENCE
For men who've had diabetes many years, one
possible
ramification is impotence, the inability to
sustain an
erection.
This can be treated in a number of ways, but the
least invasive is vacuum therapy.
The Vet-Co Vacuum Therapy System for male
impotence is
FDA-approved, safe, non-invasive, and easy to
use. For
information, call: Coast To Coast Home Medical; telephone:
1-800-330-6316.
WINDOWS SCREEN READER
GW Micro now offers WINDOW-EYES for WINDOWS 98,
a
screen reader program that also supports
Microsoft WINDOWS
3.1, WINDOWS 95 and WINDOWS 98. Once equipped with a voice
synthesizer such as the Dectalk (your standard
soundcard
won't do), any computer that can run WINDOWS can
run
WINDOW-EYES.
WINDOW-EYES reads the internet, too!
A free
demo disk is available, or you may download the
demo program
from the internet. The WINDOW-EYES program is available
from: GW
Micro, 725 Airport North Office Park, Fort Wayne,
IN 46825; telephone: (219) 489-3671; fax:
(219) 489-2608,
e-mail:
support@gwmicro.com; website:
http://www.gwmicro.com
DIABETES SUPPLIES
Diabetic Supply Distributors, Inc., helps you
save four
ways with your diabetes supplies:
1.
Insurance billing. They file the
claim, and they
pay for delivery. No advance payment needed--and THEY do
the paperwork.
2.
Medicare billing. Medicare pays
for approved
diabetes supplies (and, since last July, that
list has
covered type 2 diabetics!). Diabetic Supply will handle the
details.
3. Free,
fast home delivery. Your order comes
quickly
to your door.
4.
Friendly personal service.
You're not talking to a
computer.
Contact:
Diabetic Supply Distributors, Inc., PO Box
1820, Laurel Springs, NJ 08021; telephone: 1-800-962-8098.
DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR
Homed Pharmacy Services will deliver your
diabetic
supplies to your door. If you have Medicare, and/or private
insurance, your supplies may come at no cost to
you. Homed
handles all insurance claims, and delivery is
free. For
more information, call Homed Pharmacy Services;
telephone:
1-800-226-7212; fax: 1-800-381-9929; internet:
http://www.diabetsupply.com
NEEDLE-FREE INSULIN INJECTION
There is a way to inject insulin without a
needle! The
Vitajet 3 administers a fine jet of insulin
through the skin
without need for a needle. It works, and users report less
discomfort.
Try it yourself; 30-day money back guarantee.
Contact:
Bioject, Inc., 7620 SW Bridgeport Road, Portland,
OR 97202; telephone: 1-800-848-2538; website:
http://www.vitajet.com
VOICE DISTRIBUTORS NEEDED
Since the VOICE is now offered free, our
Diabetes
Action Network will provide extra copies to
anyone wanting
to help spread the word. We will gladly send from five to
five hundred-plus copies each quarter to be used
as free
literature.
Medical facilities can order as needed for
patients.
Individuals can usually place copies of the VOICE
in libraries, pharmacies, hospitals, doctors'
offices, or
other public locations.
Diabetes education is essential. Anyone who
distributes the VOICE will be helping people
with diabetes,
and their families, to learn about the disease
and its
ramifications; to learn that they have options;
and that
their world is far greater than whatever
"limits" may be
imposed by the disease. If you would like to help spread
the word by distributing the publication, please
contact:
Voice of the Diabetic, 811 Cherry Street, Suite
309,
Columbia, MO 65201; telephone: (573) 875-8911, fax: (573)
875-8902.
NOTE: Please provide a phone
number so we can
reach you.
SUBSCRIPTION/DONATION FORM
The VOICE OF THE DIABETIC is a quarterly
magazine
published by the Diabetes Action Network of the
National
Federation of the Blind (NFB) for anyone
interested in
diabetes, especially diabetics who are blind or
are losing
vision.
An outreach publication, it emphasizes good
diabetes control, diet, and independence.
Donations are gladly accepted and appreciated.
Contributions are not only tax deductible but
are needed to
keep the VOICE and the Diabetes Action Network
moving
forward to help people with all aspects of diabetes.
Members of the NFB Diabetes Action Network enjoy
priority services and unique benefits such as a
continuous
free subscription to the VOICE, automatic access
to
committees covering all aspects of diabetes,
free counseling
concerning all facets of blindness and diabetes,
as well as
access to diabetics who have experienced
complications.
The VOICE is free to any interested person upon
request.
Each subscription costs the Diabetes Action
Network approximately $20 per year. To help defray
publication expenses, members are invited, and
nonmembers
are encouraged, to cover the subscription cost.
To begin receiving the VOICE, please check one:
[ ] I
would like to become a member of the NFB Diabetes
Action Network and receive the VOICE OF THE
DIABETIC.
(Members are entitled to special benefits.)
[ ] I
would like to receive the VOICE OF THE DIABETIC as a
nonmember.
(Nonmembers are encouraged to pay the
institutional rate of $20/one year; $35/two
years;
$50/three years.)
Send the VOICE in (check one):
[ ]
print[ ] cassette tape for the
blind [ ] both
and physically handicapped
(recorded at slower-than-
standard speed of 15/16 IPS)
Optionally check this box:
[ ] I
would like to make (or add) a tax-deductible
contribution of $__________ to the Diabetes
Action
Network of the National Federation of the Blind.
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
Name:_____________________________________________________
Address:__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
City:_______________________ State:______ Zip:__________
Telephone:
()________________________
Send this form or a facsimile to:
Voice of the Diabetic
811 Cherry Street, Suite 309
Columbia, MO 65201
Telephone:
(573) 875-8911
Fax:
(573) 875-8902
Please make all checks payable to:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
END of VOICE OF THE DIABETIC, Volume 15, Number
2, Spring
Edition 2000